• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济地位对诊断时癌症分期和生存的影响:加拿大安大略省的一项基于人群的研究。

The impact of socioeconomic status on stage of cancer at diagnosis and survival: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Cancer. 2010 Sep 1;116(17):4160-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25427.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.25427
PMID:20681012
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lower socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with worsened cancer survival. The authors evaluate the impact of SES on stage of cancer at diagnosis and survival in Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

All incident cases of breast, colon, rectal, nonsmall cell lung, cervical, and laryngeal cancer diagnosed in Ontario during the years 2003-2007 were identified by using the Ontario Cancer Registry. Stage information is captured routinely for patients seen at Ontario's 8 Regional Cancer Centers (RCCs). The Ontario population was divided into quintiles (Q1-Q5) based on community median household income reported in the 2001 census; Q1 represents the poorest communities. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were determined with Kaplan-Meier methodology. A Cox model was used to evaluate the association between survival and SES, stage, and age.

RESULTS

Stage at diagnosis was available for 38,431 of 44,802 (85%) of cases seen at RCCs. The authors observed only very small differences in stage distribution by SES. Across all cases in Ontario, the authors found substantial gradients in 5-year OS and 3-year CSS across Q1 and Q5 for breast (7% absolute difference in OS, P < .001; 4% CSS, P < .001), colon (8% OS, P < .001; 3% CSS, P = .002), rectal (9% OS, P < .001; 4% CSS, P = .096), nonsmall cell lung (3% OS, P = .002; 2% CSS, P = .317), cervical (16% OS, P < .001; 10% CSS, P = .118), and laryngeal cancers (1% OS, P = .045; 3% CSS, P = .011). Adjustments for stage and age slightly diminished the survival gradient only among patients with breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite universal healthcare, SES remains associated with survival among patients with cancer in Ontario, Canada. Disparities in outcome were not explained by differences in stage of cancer at time of diagnosis.

摘要

背景

较低的社会经济地位(SES)与癌症预后恶化有关。作者评估 SES 对加拿大安大略省癌症诊断时的分期和生存的影响。

方法

通过使用安大略癌症登记处,确定了 2003-2007 年期间在安大略省诊断出的乳腺癌、结肠癌、直肠癌、非小细胞肺癌、宫颈癌和喉癌的所有病例。为在安大略省 8 个地区癌症中心(RCC)就诊的患者常规采集分期信息。根据 2001 年人口普查报告的社区家庭中位数收入,将安大略省人口分为五等分(Q1-Q5);Q1 代表最贫困的社区。通过 Kaplan-Meier 方法确定总生存率(OS)和癌症特异性生存率(CSS)。使用 Cox 模型评估生存与 SES、分期和年龄之间的关系。

结果

在 RCC 就诊的 44802 例病例中,有 38431 例(85%)获得了诊断时的分期。作者仅观察到 SES 对分期分布的影响非常小。在安大略省的所有病例中,作者发现 OS 和 CSS 的 5 年和 3 年生存率在 Q1 和 Q5 之间存在显著差异,乳腺癌为 7%(OS 差异绝对值,P <.001;CSS,P <.001),结肠癌为 8%(OS,P <.001;CSS,P =.002),直肠癌为 9%(OS,P <.001;CSS,P =.096),非小细胞肺癌为 3%(OS,P =.002;CSS,P =.317),宫颈癌为 16%(OS,P <.001;CSS,P =.118),喉癌为 1%(OS,P =.045;CSS,P =.011)。对分期和年龄进行调整后,仅在乳腺癌患者中,生存梯度略有减小。

结论

尽管有全民医疗保健,SES 仍然与加拿大安大略省癌症患者的生存有关。结果的差异不能用诊断时癌症分期的差异来解释。

相似文献

1
The impact of socioeconomic status on stage of cancer at diagnosis and survival: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada.社会经济地位对诊断时癌症分期和生存的影响:加拿大安大略省的一项基于人群的研究。
Cancer. 2010 Sep 1;116(17):4160-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25427.
2
Associations among socioeconomic status, patterns of care and outcomes in breast cancer patients in a universal health care system: Ontario's experience.全民医疗保健系统中乳腺癌患者的社会经济地位、护理模式与治疗结果之间的关联:安大略省的经验
Cancer. 2016 Mar 15;122(6):893-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29838. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
3
The impact of socioeconomic status on stage at presentation, receipt of diagnostic imaging, receipt of treatment and overall survival in colorectal cancer patients.社会经济地位对结直肠癌患者就诊时的分期、诊断性影像学检查的接受情况、治疗的接受情况和总生存的影响。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Sep 1;149(5):1031-1043. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33622. Epub 2021 May 20.
4
Socioeconomic differences in survival among breast cancer patients in the Netherlands not explained by tumor size.荷兰乳腺癌患者的生存状况存在社会经济差异,但肿瘤大小无法解释这一差异。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jun;127(3):721-7. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1250-z. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
5
Effects of socioeconomic status and treatment disparities in colorectal cancer survival.社会经济地位及治疗差异对结直肠癌生存率的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Aug;17(8):1950-62. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2774.
6
Associations between socioeconomic status and cancer survival: choice of SES indicator may affect results.社会经济地位与癌症生存率之间的关联:社会经济地位指标的选择可能会影响结果。
Ann Epidemiol. 2006 Jul;16(7):521-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.10.002. Epub 2006 Jan 4.
7
Cancer survival disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status in New Jersey.新泽西州不同种族/族裔和社会经济地位的癌症生存率差异
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Feb;21(1):144-60. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0263.
8
Racial disparities and socioeconomic status in association with survival in a large population-based cohort of elderly patients with colon cancer.在一个基于人群的大型老年结肠癌患者队列中,种族差异和社会经济地位与生存情况的关联。
Cancer. 2007 Aug 1;110(3):660-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22826.
9
The impact of socioeconomic status on survival after cancer in the United States : findings from the National Program of Cancer Registries Patterns of Care Study.美国社会经济地位对癌症患者生存的影响:国家癌症登记项目照护模式研究的结果
Cancer. 2008 Aug 1;113(3):582-91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23567.
10
Low socioeconomic status is a poor prognostic factor for survival in stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer and is independent of surgical treatment, race, and marital status.社会经济地位低下是Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌患者生存的不良预后因素,且独立于手术治疗、种族和婚姻状况。
Cancer. 2008 May 1;112(9):2011-20. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23397.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisiting Alma Ata: A Blueprint for Cancer Care.重温阿拉木图宣言:癌症护理蓝图
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251363701. doi: 10.1177/10732748251363701. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
2
"There's just such a mismatch": a qualitative exploration of health systems and organizational-level barriers to accessing cancer services among people experiencing structural marginalization.“存在如此严重的不匹配”:对经历结构性边缘化的人群在获取癌症服务方面的卫生系统和组织层面障碍的定性探索。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jun 18;24(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02554-8.
3
Prognostic nomogram for overall survival in pediatric osteosarcoma with pulmonary metastases: a SEER database analysis.
小儿骨肉瘤肺转移患者总生存预后列线图:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库分析
Front Pediatr. 2025 Apr 17;13:1574034. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1574034. eCollection 2025.
4
Beyond Genetics: Exploring Lifestyle, Microbiome, and Social Determinants in Oral Cancer Development.超越遗传学:探索口腔癌发生中的生活方式、微生物群和社会决定因素。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 25;17(7):1094. doi: 10.3390/cancers17071094.
5
Money Matters: The Effect of Income on Postsurgical Outcomes in Stage IA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.金钱问题:收入对ⅠA期非小细胞肺癌术后结果的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun;32(6):3933-3945. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17107-0. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
6
Exploring Outcomes by Ethnicity in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.探索异基因造血细胞移植中不同种族的治疗结果。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 14;17(4):651. doi: 10.3390/cancers17040651.
7
Toward an Understanding of Cancer as an Issue of Social Justice: Perspectives and Implications for Oncology Nursing.将癌症理解为一个社会正义问题:肿瘤护理的观点与启示
Curr Oncol. 2025 Feb 12;32(2):104. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32020104.
8
Cancer statistics for African American and Black people, 2025.2025年非裔美国人和黑人的癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2025 Mar-Apr;75(2):111-140. doi: 10.3322/caac.21874. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
9
Inequalities in relative cancer survival by race, immigration status, income, and education for 22 cancer sites in Canada, a cohort study.加拿大22种癌症部位按种族、移民身份、收入和教育程度划分的相对癌症生存率不平等:一项队列研究
Int J Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;157(1):41-54. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35337. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
10
Probabilistic bias analysis for exposure misclassification of household income by neighbourhood in a cohort of individuals with colorectal cancer.基于结直肠癌队列人群的家庭收入进行邻里水平的暴露分类偏倚的概率性分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2024 Oct 13;53(6). doi: 10.1093/ije/dyae135.