Suppr超能文献

糖尿病性黄斑水肿的视网膜厚度和容积测量:四种光学相干断层扫描系统的比较。

Retinal thickness and volume measurements in diabetic macular edema: a comparison of four optical coherence tomography systems.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Retina. 2011 Jan;31(1):48-55. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181e095a4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare different spectral domain optical coherence tomography devices regarding retinal thickness values in patients with diabetic macular edema and to correlate the results with conventional time domain Stratus OCT data.

METHODS

Thirty eyes of 30 consecutive patients with diabetic macular edema were included into a prospective study. The macula was examined by Spectralis HRA+OCT, Cirrus HD-OCT, 3D OCT-1000, and Stratus OCT. The procedures' sequence was performed by a single experienced technician in a randomized fashion according to a computer-generated list. In each eye, foveal thickness, foveal volume, and total macular volume were measured automatically. Intraclass correlation, coefficients of variance, and coefficients of repeatability were calculated.

RESULTS

Foveal thickness differed between the particular devices with a mean ± SD ranging from 359.97 ± 105.84 μm to 437.70 ± 115.84 μm. Correlation between the different OCT devices resulted in r > 0.7 (Pearson), and intraclass correlation was >0.9. Agreement of measurements was assessed showing a mean difference of foveal thickness values ranging from 19.2 μm to 77.7 μm (P < 0.05) and coefficients of repeatability ranging from 37.7 μm to 87.4 μm.

CONCLUSION

While intradevice reproducibility is satisfactory, retinal thickness and volume measurements should not be used interchangeably because measurements differed significantly between systems. The lack of interdevice agreement seems to be related to the different segmentation algorithm of thickness measurement and should be considered because it may strongly influence treatment decisions and conclusions.

摘要

目的

比较不同的谱域光相干断层扫描(OCT)设备在糖尿病黄斑水肿患者中的视网膜厚度值,并将结果与传统的时域 Stratus OCT 数据相关联。

方法

30 例(30 只眼)连续的糖尿病黄斑水肿患者纳入前瞻性研究。使用 Spectralis HRA+OCT、Cirrus HD-OCT、3D OCT-1000 和 Stratus OCT 对黄斑进行检查。根据计算机生成的列表,由一名经验丰富的技术人员以随机的方式按程序进行操作。在每只眼中,自动测量中心凹厚度、中心凹体积和全黄斑体积。计算了组内相关系数、变异系数和可重复性系数。

结果

各设备的中心凹厚度不同,平均值±标准差范围为 359.97±105.84μm 至 437.70±115.84μm。不同 OCT 设备之间的相关性导致 r >0.7(Pearson),组内相关系数>0.9。评估测量的一致性显示,中心凹厚度值的平均差异范围为 19.2μm 至 77.7μm(P<0.05),可重复性系数范围为 37.7μm 至 87.4μm。

结论

尽管设备内的可重复性令人满意,但视网膜厚度和体积的测量不应互换使用,因为不同系统之间的测量值存在显著差异。设备间缺乏一致性似乎与厚度测量的不同分割算法有关,应予以考虑,因为它可能会强烈影响治疗决策和结论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验