Department of Biology, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Av. Marechal Rondon s/n–Rosa Elze 49, São Cristóvão-SE, Brazil.
Am J Primatol. 2010 Dec;72(12):1100-7. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20873.
Line transect surveying is a relatively rapid and efficient procedure for the assessment of primate populations; although the reliability of the resulting density estimates is affected by a number of factors, including habitat configuration. In this study, primate populations were surveyed at a highly fragmented site in northeastern Brazil, where the resident species include the endangered Coimbra-Filho's titi, Callicebus coimbrai, and the critically endangered yellow-breasted capuchin, Cebus xanthosternos. In addition to standard line transect surveys, data were collected on the composition and distribution of resident groups during playback surveys and ecological monitoring. During surveys, a 5.3-km trail system was walked regularly over a 7-month period, accumulating a total transect length of 476 km and 104 sightings of Callicebus and 41 of Cebus (as well as 19 records of a third primate, Callithrix jacchus). Data were analyzed using the DISTANCE program and the Kelker method, using the perpendicular distances to first animal sighted. Estimates of group density were highly discrepant from known values for both species; although in the case of Cebus, this seemed to reflect grouping patterns at the site. For Callicebus, population density was overestimated considerably when known group counts were used. Overall, there seems to be a need for a much more rigorous standardization of procedures, and the analysis and presentation of results, in order to guarantee the most reliable interpretation possible of the data. These considerations are especially important in the case of endangered species, such as those studied here.
线截抽样调查是评估灵长类动物种群的一种相对快速有效的方法;尽管所得密度估计的可靠性受到许多因素的影响,包括栖息地的配置。在本研究中,对巴西东北部一个高度破碎化的地点的灵长类动物种群进行了调查,该地点的常驻物种包括濒危的 Coimbra-Filho 的卷尾猴、Callicebus coimbrai 和极危的黄胸卷尾猴、Cebus xanthosternos。除了标准的线截抽样调查外,在播放调查和生态监测期间还收集了关于常驻群体组成和分布的数据。在调查期间,一条 5.3 公里的小径系统在 7 个月的时间里定期行走,累计总截距长度为 476 公里,记录到 Callicebus 有 104 次,Cebus 有 41 次(以及第三种灵长类动物 Callithrix jacchus 的 19 次记录)。使用 DISTANCE 程序和 Kelker 方法分析数据,使用到首次观察到动物的垂直距离。两种物种的群体密度估计值与已知值差异很大;尽管在 Cebus 的情况下,这似乎反映了该地点的分组模式。对于 Callicebus,当使用已知的群体计数时,种群密度被大大高估了。总体而言,似乎需要更加严格地规范程序,以及分析和呈现结果,以确保对数据进行尽可能可靠的解释。这些考虑在研究这些濒危物种的情况下尤为重要。