Bradford Amanda L, Forney Karin A, Oleson Erin M, Barlow Jay
Protected Species Division, Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.
Marine Mammal and Turtle Division, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e90464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090464. eCollection 2014.
For biological populations that form aggregations (or clusters) of individuals, cluster size is an important parameter in line-transect abundance estimation and should be accurately measured. Cluster size in cetaceans has traditionally been represented as the total number of individuals in a group, but group size may be underestimated if group members are spatially diffuse. Groups of false killer whales (Pseudorca crassidens) can comprise numerous subgroups that are dispersed over tens of kilometers, leading to a spatial mismatch between a detected group and the theoretical framework of line-transect analysis. Three stocks of false killer whales are found within the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone of the Hawaiian Islands (Hawaiian EEZ): an insular main Hawaiian Islands stock, a pelagic stock, and a Northwestern Hawaiian Islands (NWHI) stock. A ship-based line-transect survey of the Hawaiian EEZ was conducted in the summer and fall of 2010, resulting in six systematic-effort visual sightings of pelagic (n = 5) and NWHI (n = 1) false killer whale groups. The maximum number and spatial extent of subgroups per sighting was 18 subgroups and 35 km, respectively. These sightings were combined with data from similar previous surveys and analyzed within the conventional line-transect estimation framework. The detection function, mean cluster size, and encounter rate were estimated separately to appropriately incorporate data collected using different methods. Unlike previous line-transect analyses of cetaceans, subgroups were treated as the analytical cluster instead of groups because subgroups better conform to the specifications of line-transect theory. Bootstrap values (n = 5,000) of the line-transect parameters were randomly combined to estimate the variance of stock-specific abundance estimates. Hawai'i pelagic and NWHI false killer whales were estimated to number 1,552 (CV = 0.66; 95% CI = 479-5,030) and 552 (CV = 1.09; 95% CI = 97-3,123) individuals, respectively. Subgroup structure is an important factor to consider in line-transect analyses of false killer whales and other species with complex grouping patterns.
对于形成个体聚集(或集群)的生物种群而言,集群大小是沿样线丰度估计中的一个重要参数,应准确测量。传统上,鲸类动物的集群大小表示为一个群体中的个体总数,但如果群体成员在空间上分布分散,群体大小可能会被低估。伪虎鲸(Pseudorca crassidens)群体可能由许多亚群组成,这些亚群分散在数十公里的范围内,导致检测到的群体与沿样线分析的理论框架之间存在空间不匹配。在美国夏威夷群岛专属经济区(夏威夷专属经济区)内发现了三种伪虎鲸种群:夏威夷主岛岛屿种群、远洋种群和夏威夷西北部岛屿(NWHI)种群。2010年夏秋两季对夏威夷专属经济区进行了一次基于船只的沿样线调查,共对远洋(n = 5)和NWHI(n = 1)伪虎鲸群体进行了6次系统观测。每次观测中亚群的最大数量和空间范围分别为18个亚群和35公里。这些观测结果与之前类似调查的数据相结合,并在传统的沿样线估计框架内进行分析。分别估计检测函数、平均集群大小和相遇率,以适当纳入使用不同方法收集的数据。与之前对鲸类动物的沿样线分析不同,亚群被视为分析集群而非群体,因为亚群更符合沿样线理论的规范。对沿样线参数的自助值(n = 5000)进行随机组合,以估计特定种群丰度估计值的方差。估计夏威夷远洋和NWHI伪虎鲸的数量分别为1552头(CV = 0.66;95% CI = 479 - 5030)和552头(CV = 1.09;95% CI = 97 - 3123)。在对伪虎鲸和其他具有复杂群体模式的物种进行沿样线分析时,亚群结构是一个需要考虑的重要因素。