Department of Conservative Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, 28-2 Yeongeon-Dong, Jongno-Gu, Seoul 110-749, Republic of Korea.
Dent Mater. 2010 Oct;26(10):1024-33. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of shrinkage strain, modulus, and instrument compliance on the polymerization shrinkage stress measurement of light-cured composites, and to determine whether the silorane-based low-shrinkage composite shows a low-polymerization shrinkage stress.
A universal hybrid; Z250 (Z2), a flowable; Z350 (Z3), and a silorane-based; P90 (P9) composite was examined. A modified "bonded disc method" was used to measure the axial shrinkage strain of the composite. For the measurement of the initial modulus development of composites during light curing, a dynamic oscillatory shear test was undertaken using a custom-made oscillation rheometer. A frequency of 6 Hz and strain amplitude of 0.0091 rad for 20 s was employed and the complex shear modulus (G(*)) was determined. A newly designed stress-strain analyzer was made to measure the shrinkage stress of the composites with two modes: (1) high compliance, or (2) low compliance. The shift between the two modes was controlled by an On-Off switch of a negative feedback circuit. Theoretical shrinkage stress was calculated from the shrinkage strain and modulus measured above, and compared with experimentally measured stress. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (alpha=0.05), and correlation analysis was done to investigate the relationship between measured stress and shrinkage strain, modulus, and theoretical stress.
The shrinkage strain of Z3 (4.12%) at 10 min was the highest, followed by Z2 (2.31%) and P9 (0.77%). At 10 s after light curing, Z2 showed the highest modulus (466.2 MPa), Z3 (154.1 MPa), and P9 the lowest (130.7 MPa). The measured stresses with low compliance were much higher than those with high compliance. With high compliance, the contraction stress of Z3 was the highest (2.75 MPa), followed by Z2 (1.54 MPa) and P9 (0.48 MPa). In low-compliance mode, the stresses of Z3 (7.93 MPa) and Z2 (7.48 MPa) were similar (p=0.323) while the stress of P9 (3.23 MPa) was much lower. A strong correlation was observed between the theoretical stress and the measured stress with low compliance (R=0.996). In high-compliance mode, the shrinkage strain also showed a near-linear relationship with the stress measured (R=0.937), but the modulus showed a low correlation with the measured stress (R=0.398).
Depending on the instrument compliance, polymerization shrinkage stress showed significant differences for each material. In high-compliance shrinkage strain played a greater role, while in low-compliance shrinkage strain and elastic modulus contributed comparably in determining the shrinkage stress. The low-shrinkage silorane-based composite demonstrated considerable reduction in shrinkage strain and stress.
本研究旨在探讨收缩应变、模量和器械顺应性对光固化复合材料聚合收缩应力测量的影响,并确定基于硅烷的低收缩复合材料是否表现出低聚合收缩应力。
研究采用了一种通用混合体 Z250(Z2)、一种流动性 Z350(Z3)和一种基于硅烷的 P90(P9)复合材料。采用改良的“粘结盘法”测量复合材料的轴向收缩应变。为测量复合材料在光固化过程中初始模量的发展,采用定制的振荡流变仪进行动态振荡剪切试验。采用 6 Hz 的频率和 20 s 的 0.0091 rad 应变幅度,确定复合剪切模量(G(*))。设计了一种新的应力-应变分析仪,采用两种模式测量复合材料的收缩应力:(1)高顺应性,或(2)低顺应性。两种模式之间的切换由负反馈电路的通断开关控制。根据以上测量的收缩应变和模量,从理论上计算收缩应力,并与实验测量的应力进行比较。采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 事后检验(alpha=0.05)进行数据分析,并进行相关分析,以研究测量的应力与收缩应变、模量和理论应力之间的关系。
Z3 在 10 分钟时的收缩应变(4.12%)最高,其次是 Z2(2.31%)和 P9(0.77%)。在光固化后 10 s,Z2 的模量最高(466.2 MPa),Z3(154.1 MPa)和 P9 最低(130.7 MPa)。低顺应性模式下测量的收缩应力明显高于高顺应性模式。在高顺应性模式下,Z3 的收缩应力最高(2.75 MPa),其次是 Z2(1.54 MPa)和 P9(0.48 MPa)。在低顺应性模式下,Z3(7.93 MPa)和 Z2(7.48 MPa)的应力相似(p=0.323),而 P9 的应力(3.23 MPa)则明显较低。在低顺应性模式下,理论应力与测量的收缩应力之间存在很强的相关性(R=0.996)。在高顺应性模式下,收缩应变与测量的收缩应力也呈近线性关系(R=0.937),但模量与测量的收缩应力相关性较低(R=0.398)。
根据仪器顺应性的不同,每种材料的聚合收缩应力都有显著差异。在高顺应性模式下,收缩应变的作用更大,而在低顺应性模式下,收缩应变和弹性模量在确定收缩应力方面具有同等重要性。基于硅烷的低收缩复合材料表现出显著降低的收缩应变和应力。