Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Sep;88(3):318-27. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.152. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
This article reviews the evidence supporting the efficacy of antidotes used or recommended for the potential chemical warfare agents of most concern. Chemical warfare agents considered include cyanide, vesicants, pulmonary irritants such as chlorine and phosgene, and nerve agents. The strength of evidence for most antidotes is weak, highlighting the need for additional research in this area.
这篇文章回顾了支持使用或推荐用于最受关注的潜在化学战剂解毒剂的疗效的证据。考虑的化学战剂包括氰化物、糜烂剂、氯气和光气等肺部刺激剂以及神经毒剂。大多数解毒剂的证据强度较弱，突出表明需要在这一领域进行更多的研究。
