Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.
ChemSusChem. 2010 Aug 23;3(8):905-12. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201000032.
Injecting liquid CO(2) into deep-sea sediments below ca. 3 km of seawater has been suggested for the permanent storage of anthropogenic CO(2). At the pressures and temperature found below 3 km of seawater, CO(2) becomes denser than seawater and so is likely to remain permanently sequestered in the sediment. Deepwater engineering, however, is expensive and seawater depths of greater than 3 km are often only reached far from shore. Here, we consider the less expensive alternative of injecting CO(2) into marine sediments at depths shallower than required for denser-than-seawater CO(2) storage. We compare the mobility of liquid CO(2) that has been injected into deep-sea reservoirs with the mobility of supercritical CO(2) that has been injected into geologically equivalent (i.e., identical porosity, permeability, and effective stress) reservoirs with terrestrial pressure and temperature conditions. We demonstrate that buoyant liquid CO(2) with a density of about 90 % that of seawater is sufficiently immobile that it can be considered trapped by gravity and capillarity. In contrast, supercritical CO(2) under typical terrestrial conditions is highly mobile and only trapped by the appropriate confining layer in either a structural or stratigraphic trap. As a result of its very high mobility under terrestrial conditions, CO(2) injected in an unconfined formation would spread beneath the confining layer to produce a large flat cylindrical-shaped plume of pure-phase CO(2). In contrast, the less mobile CO(2) in a typical deep-sea reservoir produces a spherical-shaped plume, resulting in a pure-phase-CO(2) footprint that is much smaller than the pure-phase-CO(2) footprint formed in the confined-terrestrial reservoir.
将液态 CO2 注入海水以下约 3 公里的深海沉积物中,被认为是人为 CO2 的永久储存方法。在海水以下 3 公里处的压力和温度下,CO2 的密度大于海水,因此很可能会永久地被储存在沉积物中。然而,深海工程成本高昂,而且超过 3 公里的海水深度通常只在远离海岸的地方才能达到。在这里,我们考虑一种成本较低的替代方案,即在不需要比海水密度更大的 CO2 储存所需的深度将 CO2 注入海洋沉积物中。我们比较了注入深海储层的液态 CO2 的流动性与注入具有陆地压力和温度条件的地质上等同(即相同的孔隙度、渗透率和有效应力)储层的超临界 CO2 的流动性。我们证明,密度约为海水 90%的浮力液态 CO2 足够不流动,可以被认为是被重力和毛管力捕获的。相比之下,在典型的陆地条件下,超临界 CO2 具有很高的流动性,只有在适当的封闭层中才能被捕获,无论是在构造或地层陷阱中。由于其在陆地条件下非常高的流动性,在无约束地层中注入的 CO2 将在封闭层下扩散,产生一个纯相 CO2 的大型扁平圆柱形羽流。相比之下,在典型的深海储层中流动性较差的 CO2 会产生球形羽流,从而导致纯相 CO2 足迹比在封闭的陆地储层中形成的纯相 CO2 足迹小得多。