Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Dec;51(12):6104-10. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4417. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
To determine the effect of a bifocal add and manifest correction on accommodative lag in myopic children with high accommodative lag, who have been reported to have the greatest reduction in myopia progression with progressive addition lenses (PALs).
Monocular accommodative lag to a 4-D Badal stimulus was measured on two occasions 6 months apart in 83 children (mean ± SD age, 9.9 ± 1.3 years) with high lag randomized to wearing single-vision lenses (SVLs) or PALs. Accommodative lag was measured with the following corrections: habitual, manifest, manifest with +2.00-D add, and habitual with +2.00-D add (6-month visit only).
At baseline, accommodative lag was higher (1.72 ± 0.37 D; mean ± SD) when measured with manifest correction than with habitual correction (1.51 ± 0.50; P < 0.05). This higher lag with manifest correction correlated with a larger amount of habitual undercorrection at baseline (r = -0.29, P = 0.009). A +2.00-D add over the manifest correction reduced lag by 0.45 ± 0.34 D at baseline and 0.33 ± 0.38 D at the 6-month visit. Lag results at 6 months were not different between PAL and SVL wearers (P = 0.92).
A +2.00-D bifocal add did not eliminate accommodative lag and reduced lag by less than 25% of the bifocal power, indicating that children mainly responded to a bifocal by decreasing accommodation. If myopic progression is substantial, measuring lag with full correction can overestimate the hyperopic retinal blur that a child most recently experienced. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00335049.).
确定双焦点附加镜和明视矫正对远视性离焦的影响,高度远视性离焦的近视儿童使用渐进多焦点镜片(PALs)后近视进展的减少幅度最大。
83 名(平均年龄 ± 标准差,9.9 ± 1.3 岁)高度离焦儿童,在 6 个月内进行了两次单眼 4-D Badal 刺激测量,随机分配到单焦点镜片(SVL)或渐进多焦点镜片(PAL)组。分别采用以下矫正方式测量调节滞后:习惯矫正、明视矫正、明视加+2.00-D 附加镜矫正、习惯加+2.00-D 附加镜矫正(仅在 6 个月时测量)。
基线时,明视矫正时的调节滞后(1.72 ± 0.37 D)高于习惯矫正时(1.51 ± 0.50 D;P < 0.05)。明视矫正时较高的滞后与基线时较大的习惯欠矫量相关(r = -0.29,P = 0.009)。明视矫正上加+2.00-D 附加镜,在基线时降低调节滞后 0.45 ± 0.34 D,在 6 个月时降低 0.33 ± 0.38 D。6 个月时,PAL 和 SVL 使用者之间的滞后结果无差异(P = 0.92)。
+2.00-D 双焦点附加镜不能消除调节滞后,降低的滞后幅度不到双焦点附加镜的 25%,表明儿童主要通过减少调节来适应双焦点。如果近视进展明显,用全矫测量滞后可能会高估儿童最近经历的远视性视网膜模糊。(ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT00335049)。