牛津之家与匿名戒酒互助会：两种互助模式对戒酒的影响。
Oxford House and Alcoholics Anonymous: The Impact of Two Mutual-help Models on Abstinence.
作者信息
Groh David R, Jason Leonard A, Ferrari Joseph R, Davis Margaret I
机构信息
DePaul University.
出版信息
J Groups Addict Recover. 2009 Jan;4(1-2):23-31. doi: 10.1080/15560350802712363.
Abstract
Two examples of mutual-help approaches for substance abuse recovery are 12-step groups (AA and NA) and Oxford House. The present study examined the combined effects of AA and Oxford House residence on abstinence over a 24-month period with 150 individuals randomly assigned to either an Oxford House or to usual after-care. Among individuals with high 12-step involvement, the addition of Oxford House residence significantly increased the odds of abstinence (87.5% vs. 52.9%). However, among participants with low 12-step involvement, rates of abstinence were fairly similar across conditions (31.4% vs. 21.2%). Results suggested that the joint effectiveness of these mutual-help programs may promote abstinence.
摘要
互助方式促进药物滥用康复的两个例子是12步团体（戒酒互助会和戒毒互助会）和牛津之家。本研究调查了戒酒互助会和入住牛津之家对150名个体在24个月内戒酒的综合影响，这些个体被随机分配到牛津之家或常规的后续护理组。在12步参与度高的个体中，入住牛津之家显著增加了戒酒的几率（87.5%对52.9%）。然而，在12步参与度低的参与者中，不同条件下的戒酒率相当相似（31.4%对21.2%）。结果表明，这些互助项目的联合有效性可能会促进戒酒。
相似文献
1
Oxford House and Alcoholics Anonymous: The Impact of Two Mutual-help Models on Abstinence.
J Groups Addict Recover. 2009 Jan;4(1-2):23-31. doi: 10.1080/15560350802712363.
2
Coming to Terms With Reality: Predictors of Self-deception Within Substance Abuse Recovery.
Addict Disord Their Treat. 2008 Dec 1;7(4):210-218. doi: 10.1097/ADT.0b013e31815c2ded.
3
Understanding recovery Capital in relation to categorical 12-Step involvement and abstinence social support.
Addict Res Theory. 2022;30(3):207-212. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2021.1999935. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
4
12-Step involvement among a U.S. national sample of Oxford House residents.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011 Jul;41(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
5
Twelve-step and mutual-help programs for addictive disorders.
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1999 Jun;22(2):425-46. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(05)70085-x.
6
Categorical 12-step involvement and continuous abstinence at 2 years.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013 Jan;44(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
7
Comorbid mental health and substance abuse issues among individuals in recovery homes: Prospective environmental mediators.
Ment Health Subst Use. 2014 Jan 1;7(2):170-183. doi: 10.1080/17523281.2013.806342.
8
Oxford House Recovery Homes: Characteristics and Effectiveness.
Psychol Serv. 2010 May;7(2):92-102. doi: 10.1037/a0017932.
9
Does diagnosis matter? Differential effects of 12-step participation and social networks on abstinence.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2005;31(4):685-707. doi: 10.1081/ada-68486.
10
Abstinence Self-Efficacy and Substance Use at 2 Years: The Moderating Effects of Residential Treatment Conditions.
Alcohol Treat Q. 2016;34(4):386-401. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2016.1217708. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
引用本文的文献
1
Recovery support services as part of the continuum of care for alcohol or drug use disorders.
Addiction. 2025 Jan 28. doi: 10.1111/add.16751.
2
Bridging the gap: building and sustaining recovery capital in the transition from prison to recovery residences.
J Offender Rehabil. 2024;63(1):21-36. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2023.2286648. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
3
Modeling Recovery Housing Retention and Program Outcomes by Justice Involvement among Residents in Virginia, USA: An Observational Study.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2024 Nov;68(15):1579-1597. doi: 10.1177/0306624X241254691. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
4
Spiritual Awakening in 12-Step Recovery: Impact Among Residential Aftercare Residents.
Spiritual Clin Pract (Wash D C ). 2023 Dec;10(4):337-349. doi: 10.1037/scp0000296. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
5
Effects of strength of relationship ties in recovery homes: A conundrum.
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Apr;126:104360. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104360. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
6
The Importance of Social Support in Recovery Populations: Toward a Multilevel Understanding.
Alcohol Treat Q. 2023;41(2):222-236. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2023.2181119. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
7
Pathways to Recovery: Recovery housing models for men who have sex with men (MSM).
Addict Res Theory. 2019;27(5):373-382. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2018.1538409. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
8
Recovery homes: A social network analysis of Oxford Houses for Native Americans.
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2020 Apr-Jun;19(2):174-189. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2018.1489748. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
9
Factors Affecting the Sustainability of Self-Run Recovery Homes in the United States.
Int J Self Help Self Care. 2013;7(1):99-109. doi: 10.2190/SH.7.1.g.
10
Oxford House Recovery Homes: Characteristics and Effectiveness.
Psychol Serv. 2010 May;7(2):92-102. doi: 10.1037/a0017932.
本文引用的文献
1
Communal housing settings enhance substance abuse recovery.
Am J Public Health. 2006 Oct;96(10):1727-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.070839.
2
The need for substance abuse after-care: longitudinal analysis of Oxford House.
Addict Behav. 2007 Apr;32(4):803-18. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.06.014. Epub 2006 Jul 14.
3
African American Oxford House residents: sources of abstinent social networks.
J Prev Interv Community. 2006;31(1-2):111-9. doi: 10.1300/J005v31n01_10.
4
Social support and self-efficacy for abstinence: is peer identification an issue?
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002 Oct;23(3):209-15. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(02)00261-1.
5
Comorbidity among Oxford House residents: a preliminary outcome study.
Addict Behav. 2002 Sep-Oct;27(5):837-45. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(01)00214-3.
6
Oxford house: a review of research and implications for substance abuse recovery and community research.
J Drug Educ. 2001;31(1):1-27. doi: 10.2190/TMNP-M3CC-BUPN-9EE6.
7
Does Alcoholics Anonymous work? The results from a meta-analysis of controlled experiments.
Subst Use Misuse. 1999 Nov;34(13):1897-916. doi: 10.3109/10826089909039431.
8
A survival analysis of communal-living, self-help, addiction recovery participants.
Am J Community Psychol. 1998 Dec;26(6):803-21. doi: 10.1023/a:1022241712065.
9
Network support for drinking, Alcoholics Anonymous and long-term matching effects.
Addiction. 1998 Sep;93(9):1313-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.93913133.x.
10
Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH three-year drinking outcomes.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998 Sep;22(6):1300-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1998.tb03912.x.
Zotero 插件