• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对集体生活、自助、成瘾康复参与者的生存分析。

A survival analysis of communal-living, self-help, addiction recovery participants.

作者信息

Bishop P D, Jason L A, Ferrari J R

机构信息

DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois 60614, USA.

出版信息

Am J Community Psychol. 1998 Dec;26(6):803-21. doi: 10.1023/a:1022241712065.

DOI:10.1023/a:1022241712065
PMID:10085534
Abstract

We examined individual and group characteristics associated with the duration of community involvement (i.e., length of residence) in 11 Illinois Oxford Houses for 129 male recovering addicts. Survival analyses indicated that the best predictor of duration of community involvement from demographic items was age (i.e., older age and older age of fellow residents were associated with being more likely to continue residence). Among psychological measures, the best survival predictor was lack of pessimism of the future. Although the relationship between longer length of residence and treatment outcomes are complex, because it is often difficult to keep people involved in treatment programs, knowledge that we can gain about those factors that might lead to greater lengths of stay are of importance.

摘要

我们研究了伊利诺伊州11所牛津之家的129名男性康复成瘾者中与社区参与时长(即居住时长)相关的个人和群体特征。生存分析表明,从人口统计学项目来看,社区参与时长的最佳预测指标是年龄(即年龄较大以及同住者年龄较大与更有可能继续居住相关)。在心理测量指标中,最佳生存预测指标是对未来不悲观。尽管居住时长与治疗结果之间的关系很复杂,因为让人们持续参与治疗项目往往很困难,但我们能够了解到的那些可能导致更长停留时间的因素非常重要。

相似文献

1
A survival analysis of communal-living, self-help, addiction recovery participants.对集体生活、自助、成瘾康复参与者的生存分析。
Am J Community Psychol. 1998 Dec;26(6):803-21. doi: 10.1023/a:1022241712065.
2
An exploratory analysis of women and men within a self-help, communal-living recovery setting: a new beginning in a new house.在自助式集体生活康复环境中对女性和男性进行的探索性分析:新房子里的新开端。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1999 May;25(2):305-17. doi: 10.1081/ada-100101862.
3
An exploratory study of male recovering substance abusers living in a self-help, self-governed setting.一项针对生活在自助、自治环境中的男性药物滥用康复者的探索性研究。
J Ment Health Adm. 1997 Summer;24(3):332-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02832666.
4
Sex differences in social support and self-efficacy within a recovery community.康复社区中社会支持与自我效能感的性别差异。
Am J Community Psychol. 2005 Dec;36(3-4):259-74. doi: 10.1007/s10464-005-8625-z.
5
Children, women, and substance abuse: a look at recovery in a communal setting.儿童、妇女与药物滥用:在社区环境中审视康复情况。
J Prev Interv Community. 2006;31(1-2):121-31. doi: 10.1300/J005v31n01_11.
6
Mentally ill chemical abusers in residential treatment programs: effects of psychopathology on levels of functioning.住院治疗项目中的患有精神疾病的药物滥用者:精神病理学对功能水平的影响。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 1997 May-Jun;14(3):269-74. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(96)00186-9.
7
Services received and treatment outcomes in day-hospital and residential programs.日间医院和住院项目中的服务接受情况及治疗结果。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008 Oct;35(3):232-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.10.006. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
8
[Drug Addiction Self-Help Recovery scale (DASH-scale): an approach to the measurement of recovery from drug addiction in self-help program among drug addicts].[药物成瘾自助康复量表(DASH量表):一种衡量吸毒者自助项目中药物成瘾康复情况的方法]
Nihon Arukoru Yakubutsu Igakkai Zasshi. 2004 Dec;39(6):537-47.
9
Increases in tolerance within naturalistic, intentional communities: a randomized, longitudinal examination.自然主义、有意社区内宽容度的增加:一项随机、纵向研究。
Am J Community Psychol. 2009 Dec;44(3-4):188-95. doi: 10.1007/s10464-009-9275-3.
10
The need for substance abuse after-care: longitudinal analysis of Oxford House.药物滥用后续照护的必要性:牛津之家的纵向分析
Addict Behav. 2007 Apr;32(4):803-18. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.06.014. Epub 2006 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Recovery housing and on-the-ground research priorities: a scoping study through the lens of community based participatory research.康复住房与实地研究重点:基于社区参与式研究视角的范围界定研究
Front Public Health. 2025 May 22;13:1554344. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1554344. eCollection 2025.
2
Recovery housing for substance use disorder: a systematic review.物质使用障碍康复住房:一项系统综述。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 6;13:1506412. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1506412. eCollection 2025.
3
Expansion and evaluation of level II and III recovery residences for people taking medications for an opioid use disorder: project HOMES (Housing for MAR Expanded Services) study protocol.
为接受阿片类物质使用障碍药物治疗的人扩大和评估二级和三级康复住所:项目 HOMES(MAR 扩大服务住房)研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 4;14(11):e084115. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084115.
4
Dynamic Interdependence of Advice Seeking, Loaning, and Recovery Characteristics in Recovery Homes.康复之家内寻求建议、借贷与康复特征的动态相互依存关系。
J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2022;32(5):663-678. doi: 10.1080/10911359.2021.1947930. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
5
Latent profile analysis in recovery homes: A single quantitative dimension captures most but not all of the important details of the recovery process.康复之家的潜在剖面分析:单一的定量维度可以捕捉到康复过程中最重要的但不是全部的细节。
Subst Abus. 2022;43(1):666-674. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1986880.
6
Personal and Environmental Social Capital Predictors of Relapse Following Departure from Recovery Homes.离开康复之家后复发的个人和环境社会资本预测因素。
Drugs (Abingdon Engl). 2021;28(5):504-510. doi: 10.1080/09687637.2020.1856787. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
7
Recovery homes coping with COVID-19.康复院应对 COVID-19。
J Prev Interv Community. 2022 Apr-Jun;50(2):151-162. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2021.1934941. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
8
Reducing health disparities among black individuals in the post-treatment environment.减少黑人个体在治疗后环境中的健康差距。
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2020 Dec 30:1-17. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2020.1861497.
9
METHODOLOGICAL PLURALISM AND MIXED METHODOLOGY TO STRENGTHEN COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH: AN EXAMPLE FROM OXFORD HOUSE.方法论多元主义与混合方法以加强社区心理学研究:以牛津之家为例
J Community Psychol. 2017 Jan;45(1):100-116. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21838. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
10
Development of a Three-Factor Psychological Sense of Community Scale.三因素社区心理归属感量表的编制
J Community Psychol. 2015 Nov;43(8):973-985. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21726. Epub 2015 Oct 13.