Department of Cardiology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Aug 15;106(4):528-34. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.03.069.
Atrial electrical remodeling has been shown after termination of atrial flutter (AFL); however, whether abnormalities persist beyond an arrhythmic episode is not known. We aimed to characterize the atrial substrate, remote from arrhythmia, in patients with typical AFL. We compared 20 patients, studied remote from episodes of typical AFL and without a history of atrial fibrillation, to 20 reference patients. Multipolar catheters placed at the lateral right atrium (RA), coronary sinus, crista terminalis, and septal RA measured the effective refractory period at 5 sites; conduction characteristics at the crista terminalis; and the conduction time along the lateral RA and coronary sinus. Electroanatomic right atrial maps were created to determine regional differences in voltage and conduction. Patients with AFL demonstrated the following compared to the reference patients: a larger right atrial volume (121 +/- 30 vs 83 +/- 24 ml, p = 0.005); a prolonged P-wave duration (122 +/- 18 vs 102 +/- 11 ms, p = 0.007); a longer right atrial activation time (107 +/- 23 vs 85 +/- 14 ms, p = 0.02); a prolonged conduction time along the lateral RA (67 +/- 4 vs 47 +/- 3 ms, p <0.001); a slower mean conduction velocity (1.2 +/- 0.2 vs 2.1 +/- 0.6 mm/ms, p <0.001); a greater proportion of fractionated electrographic findings (16 +/- 4% vs 10 +/- 6%, p = 0.006); more frequent abnormal electrographic findings at the crista terminalis (4.1 +/- 2.6 vs 1.0 +/- 1.1, p = 0.001); a prolonged corrected sinus node recovery time (318 +/- 71 vs 203 +/- 94 ms, p = 0.02); a trend toward greater effective refractory period (232 +/- 29 vs 213 +/- 12 ms, p = 0.06); and a lower voltage (2.1 +/- 0.5 vs 3.0 +/- 0.5 mV, p <0.001). In conclusion, studied remote from arrhythmia, patients with AFL demonstrated significant and diffuse atrial abnormalities characterized by structural changes, conduction abnormalities, and sinus node dysfunction. These persisting abnormalities characterize the substrate underlying typical AFL and may account for the subsequent development of atrial fibrillation.
心房电重构在终止房扑(AFL)后已被证实;然而,心律失常发作后是否存在持续的异常尚不清楚。我们旨在描述典型 AFL 患者远离心律失常部位的心房基质。我们比较了 20 例研究时远离典型 AFL 发作且无房颤病史的患者和 20 例对照患者。多极导管置于右侧心房(RA)外侧、冠状窦、冠状窦末端和 RA 中隔测量 5 个部位的有效不应期;在冠状窦末端测量传导特性;以及沿右侧 RA 和冠状窦的传导时间。电解剖右房图用于确定电压和传导的局部差异。与对照患者相比,AFL 患者表现为:右房容积较大(121 ± 30 比 83 ± 24 ml,p = 0.005);P 波时限延长(122 ± 18 比 102 ± 11 ms,p = 0.007);右房激活时间延长(107 ± 23 比 85 ± 14 ms,p = 0.02);沿右侧 RA 的传导时间延长(67 ± 4 比 47 ± 3 ms,p <0.001);平均传导速度较慢(1.2 ± 0.2 比 2.1 ± 0.6 mm/ms,p <0.001);碎裂电图表现的比例较大(16 ± 4% 比 10 ± 6%,p = 0.006);冠状窦末端异常电图表现更常见(4.1 ± 2.6 比 1.0 ± 1.1,p = 0.001);校正窦房结恢复时间延长(318 ± 71 比 203 ± 94 ms,p = 0.02);有效不应期有延长趋势(232 ± 29 比 213 ± 12 ms,p = 0.06);电压较低(2.1 ± 0.5 比 3.0 ± 0.5 mV,p <0.001)。总之,远离心律失常的 AFL 患者表现出显著而广泛的心房异常,其特征为结构改变、传导异常和窦房结功能障碍。这些持续存在的异常特征构成了典型 AFL 的基质,并可能导致随后发生房颤。