Suppr超能文献

所有犯罪者都一样吗?比较性胁迫和侵犯的风险因素。

Are all perpetrators alike? Comparing risk factors for sexual coercion and aggression.

机构信息

University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.

出版信息

Sex Abuse. 2010 Dec;22(4):402-26. doi: 10.1177/1079063210372140. Epub 2010 Aug 6.

Abstract

The present study developed and contrasted predictive models of male nonphysical sexual coercion (e.g., verbal pressure or manipulation) and physical sexual aggression (e.g., incapacitation, physical force, or threats) using a sample of 369 incarcerated males to identify shared and unique risk factors for each form of sexual perpetration. Results revealed a set of shared risk characteristics that predisposed individuals to both sexual coercion and aggression (i.e., belief in rape myths, sexual promiscuity, aggressive tendencies, and empathic deficits). In addition, findings indicated that whether the offenders engaged in only sexual coercion or also used more violent sexually aggressive tactics depended on the presence of two sets of traits unique to these forms of perpetration. Specifically, sexual coercers tended to possess traits that facilitated the use of verbal tactics (i.e., ability to manipulate others and to imagine others' emotional reactions). In contrast, sexual aggressors had characteristics that could increase their willingness to "cross the line" and resort to more violent means to obtain sex from an unwilling partner (i.e., hostility toward women, egocentricity, an impulsive disregard for sociolegal proscriptions, and childhood emotional abuse). A model of general sexual perpetration that directly contrasted sexually coercive and aggressive men was also developed, and hostility toward women was identified as the only predictor capable of predicting perpetrator group membership. Together, these findings suggest that although sexual coercers and aggressors share some underlying risk factors, the etiological patterns of these behaviors are distinct and necessitate individual attention by researchers and prevention programs.

摘要

本研究使用 369 名被监禁男性的样本,开发并对比了男性非身体性性胁迫(如言语施压或操纵)和身体性性侵犯(如使失去能力、身体强迫或威胁)的预测模型,以确定每种性侵犯形式的共同和独特的风险因素。研究结果揭示了一系列共同的风险特征,这些特征使个体容易受到性胁迫和侵犯(即,相信强奸神话、性滥交、攻击性倾向和同理心缺陷)。此外,研究结果表明,犯罪者是否只从事性胁迫或还使用更暴力的性侵犯策略,取决于这两种形式的侵犯所特有的两组特征的存在。具体而言,性胁迫者往往具有促进使用言语策略的特征(即,能够操纵他人并想象他人的情绪反应)。相比之下,性侵犯者具有增加他们“越过底线”并诉诸更暴力手段从不愿意的伴侣那里获得性的特征(即,对女性的敌意、自我中心、冲动地无视社会法律规定以及童年情感虐待)。还开发了一种直接对比性胁迫者和侵犯者的一般性性侵犯模型,发现对女性的敌意是唯一能够预测犯罪者群体归属的预测因子。总之,这些发现表明,尽管性胁迫者和侵犯者有一些共同的潜在风险因素,但这些行为的病因模式是不同的,需要研究人员和预防计划给予个别关注。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验