Fornicola Errin, Peterson Zoë D
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Counseling and Educational Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Int J Sex Health. 2022 Mar 29;34(3):397-408. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2022.2053027. eCollection 2022.
This study sought to examine the association between perpetrator gender and victim gender and the use of sexually aggressive tactics (e.g., persistent enticement, verbal pressure, taking advantage of the inability to consent, and ignoring explicit non-consent). Participants were recruited from research panels to complete an online survey. They were asked to indicate which, if any, of 39 sexually aggressive tactics-representing four categories and nine subcategories-they had used to obtain sex, answering based on the gender with whom they most often have sex. Participants included 132 men who answered based on experiences with men (MSM), 131 men who answered based on experiences with women (MSW), 232 women who answered based on experiences with men (WSM), and 56 women who answered based on experiences with women (WSW). MSM were more likely than all other groups to use enticement and more likely than WSM to engage in explicitly nonconsensual sex. WSM were more likely than MSW and WSW to take advantage of their partner's impaired ability to consent. There was no difference among groups in use of verbal pressure. Gendered sexual stereotypes may contribute to the types of tactics used by men and women against men and women.
本研究旨在探讨犯罪者性别与受害者性别之间的关联，以及性侵犯策略的使用情况（例如，持续引诱、言语施压、利用对方无法同意的情况以及无视明确的不同意）。参与者从研究小组中招募，以完成一项在线调查。他们被要求指出在39种性侵犯策略（代表四个类别和九个子类别）中，他们曾使用过哪些策略来获得性行为，并根据他们最常发生性行为的对象的性别进行回答。参与者包括132名基于与男性的经历作答的男性（男同性恋者）、131名基于与女性的经历作答的男性（异性恋男性）、232名基于与男性的经历作答的女性（女同性恋者）以及56名基于与女性的经历作答的女性（异性恋女性）。男同性恋者比所有其他群体更有可能使用引诱手段，并且比女同性恋者更有可能进行明确的非自愿性行为。异性恋女性比异性恋男性和女同性恋者更有可能利用伴侣同意能力受损的情况。在言语施压的使用上，各群体之间没有差异。性别化的性刻板印象可能导致男性和女性针对男性和女性使用不同类型的策略。
