• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越塔斯基吉:理解对参与研究的不信任

More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation.

作者信息

Scharff Darcell P, Mathews Katherine J, Jackson Pamela, Hoffsuemmer Jonathan, Martin Emeobong, Edwards Dorothy

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Associate Dean, Saint Louis University School of Public Health, 3545 Lafayette Ave, St Louis, MO 63104, USA.

出版信息

J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Aug;21(3):879-97. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0323.

DOI:10.1353/hpu.0.0323
PMID:20693733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4354806/
Abstract

This paper describes results of a qualitative study that explored barriers to research participation among African American adults. A purposive sampling strategy was used to identify African American adults with and without previous research experience. A total of 11 focus groups were conducted. Groups ranged in size from 4-10 participants (N=70). Mistrust of the health care system emerged as a primary barrier to participation in medical research among participants in our study. Mistrust stems from historical events including the Tuskegee syphilis study and is reinforced by health system issues and discriminatory events that continue to this day. Mistrust was an important barrier expressed across all groups regardless of prior research participation or socioeconomic status. This study illustrates the multifaceted nature of mistrust, and suggests that mistrust remains an important barrier to research participation. Researchers should incorporate strategies to reduce mistrust and thereby increase participation among African Americans.

摘要

本文描述了一项定性研究的结果,该研究探讨了非裔美国成年人参与研究的障碍。采用了目的抽样策略来确定有和没有先前研究经验的非裔美国成年人。总共进行了11个焦点小组讨论。小组规模从4至10名参与者不等(N = 70)。对医疗保健系统的不信任成为我们研究参与者参与医学研究的主要障碍。不信任源于包括塔斯基吉梅毒研究在内的历史事件,并因至今仍存在的卫生系统问题和歧视性事件而加剧。无论先前是否参与研究或社会经济地位如何,不信任都是所有小组表达的一个重要障碍。这项研究说明了不信任的多面性,并表明不信任仍然是参与研究的一个重要障碍。研究人员应采用策略来减少不信任,从而增加非裔美国人的参与度。

相似文献

1
More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation.超越塔斯基吉:理解对参与研究的不信任
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Aug;21(3):879-97. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0323.
2
The legacy of Tuskegee and trust in medical care: is Tuskegee responsible for race differences in mistrust of medical care?塔斯基吉梅毒研究的遗留问题与对医疗保健的信任:塔斯基吉梅毒研究是否导致了医疗保健不信任方面的种族差异?
J Natl Med Assoc. 2005 Jul;97(7):951-6.
3
Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care.在塔斯基吉的阴影下:非裔美国人和医疗保健
Am J Public Health. 1997 Nov;87(11):1773-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.11.1773.
4
Re: Scharff DP, Matthews KJ, Jackson P, Hoffsuemmer J, Martin E, Edwards D. More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Aug;21(3):879–97.回复:沙夫 DP、马修斯 KJ、杰克逊 P、霍夫苏默 J、马丁 E、爱德华兹 D。不止于塔斯基吉:理解对参与研究的不信任。《卫生保健贫困与服务不足杂志》。2010 年 8 月;21(3):879–97。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011 Feb;22(1):397-8; author reply 399-400.
5
The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis and public perceptions of biomedical research: a focus group study.塔斯基吉未治疗梅毒研究与公众对生物医学研究的认知:一项焦点小组研究
J Natl Med Assoc. 2004 Aug;96(8):1051-64.
6
Race and U.S. medical experimentation: the case of Tuskegee.种族与美国医学实验:塔斯基吉梅毒研究案例
Cad Saude Publica. 2017 May 8;33Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e00168016. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00168016.
7
Narrative constructions of health care issues and policies: the case of President Clinton's apology-by-proxy for the Tuskegee syphilis experiment.医疗保健问题与政策的叙事建构:以克林顿总统就塔斯基吉梅毒实验的间接道歉为例。
J Med Humanit. 2008 Jun;29(2):89-109. doi: 10.1007/s10912-008-9053-5.
8
Challenges in a narrative about the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis.关于塔斯基吉未治疗梅毒研究的叙述中的挑战。
J Transcult Nurs. 2008 Apr;19(2):105-6. doi: 10.1177/1043659608314196.
9
The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1932 to 1972: implications for HIV education and AIDS risk education programs in the black community.塔斯基吉梅毒研究,1932年至1972年:对黑人社区的艾滋病病毒教育和艾滋病风险教育项目的启示
Am J Public Health. 1991 Nov;81(11):1498-505. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.11.1498.
10
Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research.非裔美国人对参与医学研究的态度和信念。
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Sep;14(9):537-46. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.07048.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The research equity and diversity initiative (READI): Changing the face of clinical research through community outreach and engagement.研究公平与多样性倡议(READI):通过社区外展和参与改变临床研究的面貌。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jul 7;9(1):e156. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.10085. eCollection 2025.
2
"Not Knowing that I Could Get Addicted at Any Moment": Drug Use Initiation Narratives among Black Americans.“不知自己随时可能上瘾”:美国黑人中的吸毒起始经历叙述
Qual Psychol. 2024 Dec 16. doi: 10.1037/qup0000325.
3
Bridging Health Disparity Gaps in Alzheimer's Disease among Marginalized Populations: Clinical Proteomics as a Case Study.弥合边缘化人群中阿尔茨海默病的健康差距:以临床蛋白质组学为例
ACS Bio Med Chem Au. 2025 Jul 8;5(4):505-518. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomedchemau.5c00074. eCollection 2025 Aug 20.
4
Understanding Associations Between Patient-Level Factors and Participation in a Breast Cancer Clinical Trial.了解患者层面因素与参与乳腺癌临床试验之间的关联。
Cancer Med. 2025 Aug;14(16):e71010. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71010.
5
Determinants of mistrust in digital health research and approaches to address them among Muslim ethnic minorities living in the United Kingdom: a qualitative study.英国穆斯林少数族裔对数字健康研究不信任的决定因素及解决方法:一项定性研究
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Aug 15;24(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02583-3.
6
Bots and Fake Participants: Ensuring Valid and Reliable Data Collection Using Online Participant Recruitment Methods.机器人与虚假参与者:使用在线参与者招募方法确保数据收集的有效性和可靠性。
Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2025 Jul;28(4):463-473. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2024.2410176. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
7
Diversity and inclusivity in oncology: A narrative review and orientation for institutional measures in Germany.肿瘤学中的多样性与包容性:德国机构措施的叙述性综述与指南
Transl Oncol. 2025 Oct;60:102493. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2025.102493. Epub 2025 Aug 8.
8
Virtual Reality Interventions of Daily Versus Weekly Data Collection in Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Adults With Cancer: Pilot Survey Study.成人癌症患者自我报告结局中每日与每周数据收集的虚拟现实干预:试点调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 29;9:e73506. doi: 10.2196/73506.
9
Digital Informed Consent for Older Adults in Emergency Department Research.急诊科研究中老年患者的数字知情同意书。
Appl Hum Factors Ergon Conf. 2023;78. doi: 10.54941/ahfe1003449.
10
Racial disparities related to the perception of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness among parents of children aged 0-12 years old in Canada.加拿大0至12岁儿童家长对新冠疫苗有效性认知方面的种族差异。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2535167. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2535167. Epub 2025 Jul 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Racial differences in parents' distrust of medicine and research.父母对医学和研究不信任方面的种族差异。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Feb;163(2):108-14. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.521.
2
Critical elements of culturally competent communication in the medical encounter: a review and model.医疗问诊中文化胜任力沟通的关键要素:综述与模型
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Feb;68(3):533-43. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.10.015. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
3
Unintended effects of emphasizing disparities in cancer communication to African-Americans.向非裔美国人强调癌症信息差异的意外影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Nov;17(11):2946-53. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0101.
4
Prescribing "placebo treatments": results of national survey of US internists and rheumatologists.开具“安慰剂治疗”:美国内科医生和风湿病学家全国调查结果
BMJ. 2008 Oct 23;337:a1938. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1938.
5
Integrating research and action: a systematic review of community-based participatory research to address health disparities in environmental and occupational health in the USA.整合研究与行动:对美国基于社区的参与性研究以解决环境与职业健康方面的健康差异的系统评价
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Aug;62(8):668-76. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.067645.
6
Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, and future directions.向参与者传达临床研究结果:态度、做法及未来方向。
PLoS Med. 2008 May 13;5(5):e91. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050091.
7
Factors associated with African Americans' enrollment in a national cancer genetics registry.与非裔美国人加入国家癌症基因登记处相关的因素。
Community Genet. 2008;11(4):224-33. doi: 10.1159/000116883. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
8
Race, medical researcher distrust, perceived harm, and willingness to participate in cardiovascular prevention trials.种族、对医学研究人员的不信任、感知到的危害以及参与心血管预防试验的意愿。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2008 Jan;87(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e3181625d78.
9
Factors affecting research participation in African American college students.影响非裔美国大学生参与研究的因素。
Fam Med. 2008 Jan;40(1):46-51.
10
Willingness of minorities to participate in biomedical studies: confirmatory findings from a follow-up study using the Tuskegee Legacy Project Questionnaire.少数群体参与生物医学研究的意愿:使用塔斯基吉遗产项目问卷的后续研究的确证性发现。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2007 Sep;99(9):1052-60.