Bates Benjamin R, Harris Tina M
School of Communication Studies, Lasher Hall, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45710, USA.
J Natl Med Assoc. 2004 Aug;96(8):1051-64.
African Americans are less likely than European Americans to participate in biomedical research. Researchers often attribute nonparticipation to the "Tuskegee effect." Using critical qualitative analysis of focus group data, we examined the public's use of the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis (TSUS) to discuss biomedical research. Our participants articulated three primary themes in relation to TSUS: 1) that TSUS made them suspicious about biomedical research; 2) that other values had to weigh against concerns about TSUS; and 3) that African Americans could take steps to resolve their concerns about TSUS. African Americans were more likely to discuss TSUS than were European Americans. African Americans did not use TSUS to express simple fear. African Americans suggested issues other than TSUS that influence the decision to participate in research. African Americans indicated specific reforms that would increase participation in research. We discuss how a better understanding of African Americans' use of TSUS can enhance research participation and allay concerns about "another Tuskegee."
非裔美国人参与生物医学研究的可能性低于欧裔美国人。研究人员常将不参与归因于“塔斯基吉效应”。通过对焦点小组数据进行批判性定性分析,我们研究了公众如何利用塔斯基吉梅毒未治疗研究(TSUS)来讨论生物医学研究。我们的参与者围绕TSUS阐述了三个主要主题:1)TSUS使他们对生物医学研究产生怀疑;2)其他价值观必须权衡对TSUS的担忧;3)非裔美国人可以采取措施解决他们对TSUS的担忧。非裔美国人比欧裔美国人更有可能讨论TSUS。非裔美国人并非用TSUS来表达单纯的恐惧。非裔美国人提出了除TSUS之外影响参与研究决策的其他问题。非裔美国人指出了能够增加研究参与度的具体改革措施。我们讨论了更好地理解非裔美国人对TSUS的利用如何能够提高研究参与度并减轻对“另一个塔斯基吉事件”的担忧。