Duarte Pimentel G, Portero-McLellan K C, Maestá N, Corrente J E, Burini R C
Department of Public Health, Center of Metabolism in Exercise and Nutrition, Sao Paulo State University/UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Nutr Hosp. 2010 Jul-Aug;25(4):656-61.
We aim was to compare the sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) with waist circumference (WC) as a predictor of central obesity among adults and to identify the sensitivity and specificity of the best cut-off point for SAD.
A cross-sectional study of 266 Brazilians adults (euthrophic and overweight), aged 31-84 years old, of which 89 men and 177 women, was carried out. Anthropometric measurements such as SAD, weight, height, waist and hip circumferences, waist and hip ratio, body mass index, body fat percentage were performed. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve was used to identify the sensitivity and specificity of the best cut off point for SAD as a predictor of central obesity. Statistical analysis were considered significant with a value of p < 0.05.
The SAD measurement was positively correlated with WC for both genders, although stronger among overweight and obesity women (r = 0.71; p < 0.001 and r = 0.79; p < 0.001, respectively) than men. ROC curves identified the best cut-off points for SAD of 23.1 cm and 20.1 cm for men and women (96% and 85% sensitivity, 86% and 84% specificity, respectively).
SAD measurement may be used as an anthropometric tool to identify central obesity among women for presenting adequate sensitivity and specificity.
我们旨在比较成年人腹部矢状径(SAD)与腰围(WC)作为中心性肥胖预测指标的情况,并确定SAD最佳切点的敏感性和特异性。
对266名年龄在31 - 84岁的巴西成年人(包括营养正常和超重者)进行了一项横断面研究,其中男性89名,女性177名。进行了人体测量,如SAD、体重、身高、腰围和臀围、腰臀比、体重指数、体脂百分比。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线来确定SAD作为中心性肥胖预测指标的最佳切点的敏感性和特异性。当p值 < 0.05时,统计分析被认为具有显著性。
SAD测量值与男女两性的WC均呈正相关,不过超重和肥胖女性中的相关性更强(分别为r = 0.71;p < 0.001和r = 0.79;p < 0.001)。ROC曲线确定男性和女性SAD的最佳切点分别为23.1 cm和20.1 cm(敏感性分别为96%和85%,特异性分别为86%和84%)。
由于SAD测量具有足够的敏感性和特异性,可作为一种人体测量工具用于识别女性的中心性肥胖。