Kee C C, Jamaiyah H, Geeta A, Ali Z Ahmad, Safiza M N Noor, Suzana S, Khor G L, Rahmah R, Jamalludin A R, Sumarni M G, Lim K H, Faudzi Y Ahmad, Amal N M
Institute for Medical Research, Epidemiology & Biostatistics Unit, Jalan Pahang, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan 50588, Malaysia.
Med J Malaysia. 2011 Dec;66(5):462-7.
Generalised obesity and central obesity are risk factors for Type II diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases. Waist circumference (WC) has been suggested as a single screening tool for identification of overweight or obese subjects in lieu of the body mass index (BMI) for weight management in public health program. Currently, the recommended waist circumference cut-off points of > or = 94cm for men and > or =80cm for women (waist action level 1) and > or = 102cm for men and > or = 88cm for women (waist action level 2) used for identification of overweight and obesity are based on studies in Caucasian populations. The objective of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the recommended waist action levels, and to determine optimal WC cut-off points for identification of overweight or obesity with central fat distribution based on BMI for Malaysian adults. Data from 32,773 subjects (14,982 men and 17,791 women) aged 18 and above who participated in the Third National Health Morbidity Survey in 2006 were analysed. Sensitivity and specificity of WC at waist action level 1 were 48.3% and 97.5% for men; and 84.2% and 80.6% for women when compared to the cut-off points based on BMI > or = 25kg/m2. At waist action level 2, sensitivity and specificity were 52.4% and 98.0% for men, and 79.2% and 85.4% for women when compared with the cut-off points based on BMI (> or = 30 kg/m2). Receiver operating characteristic analyses showed that the appropriatescreening cut-off points for WC to identify subjects with overweight (> or = 25kg/m2) was 86.0cm (sensitivity=83.6%, specificity=82.5%) for men, and 79.1cm (sensitivity=85.0%, specificity=79.5%) for women. Waist circumference cut-off points to identify obese subjects (BMI > or = 30 kg/m2) was 93.2cm (sensitivity=86.5%, specificity=85.7%) for men and 85.2cm (sensitivity=77.9%, specificity=78.0%) for women. Our findings demonstrated that the current recommended waist circumference cut-off points have low sensitivity for identification of overweight and obesity in men. We suggest that these newly identified cut-off points be considered.
全身性肥胖和中心性肥胖是II型糖尿病和心血管疾病的危险因素。腰围(WC)已被提议作为一种单一的筛查工具,用于识别超重或肥胖个体,以替代在公共卫生项目中用于体重管理的体重指数(BMI)。目前,用于识别超重和肥胖的推荐腰围切点,即男性≥94厘米、女性≥80厘米(腰围行动水平1)以及男性≥102厘米、女性≥88厘米(腰围行动水平2),是基于对白种人群的研究得出的。本研究的目的是评估推荐的腰围行动水平的敏感性和特异性,并根据BMI确定马来西亚成年人中用于识别具有中心性脂肪分布的超重或肥胖个体的最佳腰围切点。分析了2006年参加第三次全国健康发病率调查的32773名18岁及以上受试者(14982名男性和17791名女性)的数据。与基于BMI≥25kg/m²的切点相比,腰围行动水平1时男性腰围的敏感性和特异性分别为48.3%和97.5%;女性分别为84.2%和80.6%。在腰围行动水平2时,与基于BMI(≥30kg/m²)的切点相比,男性的敏感性和特异性分别为52.4%和98.0%,女性分别为79.2%和85.4%。受试者工作特征分析表明,用于识别超重(≥25kg/m²)个体的腰围合适筛查切点,男性为86.0厘米(敏感性=83.6%,特异性=82.5%),女性为79.1厘米(敏感性=85.0%,特异性=79.5%)。用于识别肥胖个体(BMI≥30kg/m²)的腰围切点,男性为93.2厘米(敏感性=86.5%,特异性=85.7%),女性为85.2厘米(敏感性=77.9%,特异性=78.0%)。我们的研究结果表明,目前推荐的腰围切点在识别男性超重和肥胖方面敏感性较低。我们建议考虑这些新确定的切点。