Suppr超能文献

多中心研究艰难梭菌感染率 2000 年至 2006 年。

Multicenter study of Clostridium difficile infection rates from 2000 to 2006.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8051, 660 South Euclid, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;31(10):1030-7. doi: 10.1086/656245.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare incidence rates of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) during a 6-year period among 5 geographically diverse academic medical centers across the United States by use of recommended standardized surveillance definitions of CDI that incorporate recent information on healthcare facility (HCF) exposure.

METHODS

Data on C. difficile toxin assay results and dates of hospital admission and discharge were collected from electronic databases. Chart review was performed for patients with a positive C. difficile toxin assay result who were identified within 48 hours after hospital admission to determine whether they had any HCF exposure during the 90 days prior to their hospital admission. CDI cases, defined as any inpatient with a stool toxin assay positive for C. difficile, were categorized into 5 surveillance definitions based on recent HCF exposure. Annual CDI rates were calculated and evaluated by use of the chi(2) test for trend and the chi(2) summary test.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were significant increases in the overall incidence rates of HCF-onset, HCF-associated CDI (from 7.0 to 8.5 cases per 10,000 patient-days; P < .001); community-onset, HCF-associated CDI attributed to a study hospital (from 1.1 to 1.3 cases per 10,000 patient-days; P = .003); and community-onset, HCF-associated CDI not attributed to a study hospital (from 0.8 to 1.5 cases per 1,000 admissions overall; P < .001). For each surveillance definition of CDI, there were significant differences in the total incidence rate between HCFs.

CONCLUSIONS

The increasing incidence rates of CDI over time and across healthcare institutions and the correlation of CDI incidence in different surveillance categories suggest that CDI may be a regional problem and not isolated to a single HCF within a community.

摘要

目的

通过使用包含近期医疗机构(HCF)暴露信息的推荐的标准化 CDI 监测定义,比较美国 5 个地理位置不同的学术医疗中心在 6 年内的艰难梭菌感染(CDI)发生率。

方法

从电子数据库中收集艰难梭菌毒素检测结果以及住院和出院日期的数据。对在入院后 48 小时内检测出阳性艰难梭菌毒素的患者进行病历回顾,以确定他们在入院前 90 天内是否有任何 HCF 暴露。将 CDI 病例定义为任何粪便毒素检测阳性的住院患者,并根据近期 HCF 暴露情况将其分为 5 种监测定义。使用 χ²趋势检验和 χ²汇总检验评估年度 CDI 发生率。

结果

在研究期间,HCF 发病、HCF 相关 CDI 的总发病率(从 7.0 例/10000 患者日升至 8.5 例/10000 患者日;P<0.001);归因于研究医院的社区发病、HCF 相关 CDI(从 1.1 例/10000 患者日增至 1.3 例/10000 患者日;P=0.003);以及归因于非研究医院的社区发病、HCF 相关 CDI(总体每 1000 例入院 0.8-1.5 例;P<0.001)的发病率均显著增加。对于 CDI 的每种监测定义,HCF 之间的总发病率存在显著差异。

结论

随着时间的推移和医疗机构的不同,CDI 的发病率不断上升,并且不同监测类别中 CDI 的发病率存在相关性,这表明 CDI 可能是一个区域性问题,而不是局限于社区内的单个 HCF。

相似文献

1
Multicenter study of Clostridium difficile infection rates from 2000 to 2006.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;31(10):1030-7. doi: 10.1086/656245.
4
Hospital-associated Clostridium difficile infection: is it necessary to track community-onset disease?
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;30(4):332-7. doi: 10.1086/596604.
5
Assessment of administrative data for evaluating the shifting acquisition of Clostridium difficile infection in England.
J Hosp Infect. 2012 Mar;80(3):229-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Feb 4.
6
Using electronic health information to risk-stratify rates of Clostridium difficile infection in US hospitals.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Jul;32(7):649-55. doi: 10.1086/660360.
7
Outcomes of Community and Healthcare-onset Clostridium difficile Infections.
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 8;68(8):1343-1350. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy715.
9
Epidemiologic Trends in Clostridioides difficile Infections in a Regional Community Hospital Network.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1914149. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14149.

引用本文的文献

1
Dominance of toxigenic strains and the appearance of the emerging PCR ribotype 955 in hospitals in Silesia, Poland.
Front Microbiol. 2025 Aug 11;16:1644051. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1644051. eCollection 2025.
2
Strategies to prevent infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;44(4):527-549. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.18.
3
Time trends and predictors of laboratory-confirmed recurrent and severe infections in Manitoba: a population-based study.
CMAJ Open. 2020 Nov 16;8(4):E737-E746. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190191. Print 2020 Oct-Dec.
5
Incidence and Outcomes Associated With Clostridium difficile Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1917597. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17597.
6
Global burden of infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Glob Health. 2019 Jun;9(1):010407. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.010407.
8
Community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection in Serbian pediatric population.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Jun;37(6):1061-1069. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3218-6. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

本文引用的文献

1
The A, B, BI, and Cs of Clostridium difficile.
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Oct 15;49(8):1148-52. doi: 10.1086/605639.
3
Clostridium difficile infection in Ohio hospitals and nursing homes during 2006.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;30(6):526-33. doi: 10.1086/597507.
7
Assessment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease surveillance definitions, North Carolina, 2005.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Mar;29(3):197-202. doi: 10.1086/528813.
8
Recommendations for surveillance of Clostridium difficile-associated disease.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;28(2):140-5. doi: 10.1086/511798. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
9
Clostridium difficile infection in patients discharged from US short-stay hospitals, 1996-2003.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Mar;12(3):409-15. doi: 10.3201/eid1205.051064.
10
An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 8;353(23):2433-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051590. Epub 2005 Dec 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验