文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

经胸腔内置管引流术治疗成人恶性胸腔积液的疗效和安全性:系统评价。

Efficacy and safety of tunneled pleural catheters in adults with malignant pleural effusions: a systematic review.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 10, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jan;26(1):70-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1472-0. Epub 2010 Aug 10.


DOI:10.1007/s11606-010-1472-0
PMID:20697963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3024099/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) are a frequent cause of dyspnea and discomfort at the end of cancer patients' lives. The tunneled indwelling pleural catheter (TIPC) was approved by the FDA in 1997 and has been investigated as a treatment for MPE. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review published data on the efficacy and safety of the TIPC for treatment of MPE. DESIGN: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Science databases to identify studies published through October 2009 that reported outcomes in adult patients with MPE treated with a TIPC. Data were aggregated using summary statistics when outcomes were described in the same way among multiple primary studies. MAIN MEASURES: Symptomatic improvement and complications associated with use of the TIPC. KEY RESULTS: Nineteen studies with a total of 1,370 patients met criteria for inclusion in the review. Only one randomized study directly compared the TIPC with the current gold standard treatment, pleurodesis. All other studies were case series. Symptomatic improvement was reported in 628/657 patients (95.6%). Quality of life measurements were infrequently reported. Spontaneous pleurodesis occurred in 430/943 patients (45.6%). Serious complications were rare and included empyema in 33/1168 patients (2.8%), pneumothorax requiring a chest tube in 3/51 (5.9%), and unspecified pneumothorax in 17/439 (3.9%). Minor complications included cellulitis in 32/935 (3.4%), obstruction/clogging in 33/895 (3.7%) and unspecified malfunction of the catheter in 11/121 (9.1%). The use of the TIPC was without complication in 517/591 patients (87.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on low-quality evidence in the form of case series, the TIPC may improve symptoms for patients with MPE and does not appear to be associated with major complications. Prospective randomized studies comparing the TIPC to pleurodesis are needed before the TIPC can be definitively recommended as a first-line treatment of MPE.

摘要

背景:恶性胸腔积液(MPE)是癌症患者生命末期呼吸困难和不适的常见原因。隧道式留置胸腔导管(TIPC)于 1997 年获得 FDA 批准,已被研究用于治疗 MPE。

目的:系统评价 TIPC 治疗 MPE 的疗效和安全性的已发表数据。

设计:我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 ISI Web of Science 数据库,以确定截至 2009 年 10 月发表的报告 MPE 成年患者使用 TIPC 治疗结果的研究。当多个主要研究以相同的方式描述结果时,使用汇总统计数据汇总数据。

主要测量指标:TIPC 使用相关的症状改善和并发症。

主要结果:19 项研究共纳入 1370 例患者,符合纳入标准。只有一项随机研究直接比较了 TIPC 与目前的金标准治疗方法胸膜固定术。所有其他研究均为病例系列研究。657 例患者中有 628 例(95.6%)报告症状改善。生活质量测量结果报告频率较低。439 例患者中有 430 例(45.6%)发生自发性胸膜固定。严重并发症罕见,包括 1168 例患者中有 33 例(2.8%)脓胸,51 例患者中有 3 例(5.9%)需要胸腔引流的气胸,439 例患者中有 17 例(3.9%)未特指的气胸。轻微并发症包括 935 例患者中有 32 例(3.4%)蜂窝织炎,895 例患者中有 33 例(3.7%)导管堵塞/阻塞和 121 例患者中有 11 例(9.1%)导管未特指的功能障碍。在 591 例患者中有 517 例(87.5%)使用 TIPC 无并发症。

结论:基于病例系列的低质量证据,TIPC 可能改善 MPE 患者的症状,且似乎与主要并发症无关。需要前瞻性随机研究比较 TIPC 与胸膜固定术,才能明确推荐 TIPC 作为 MPE 的一线治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d796/3024099/81c96ff95564/11606_2010_1472_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d796/3024099/8d7b2a5dbcf7/11606_2010_1472_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d796/3024099/81c96ff95564/11606_2010_1472_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d796/3024099/8d7b2a5dbcf7/11606_2010_1472_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d796/3024099/81c96ff95564/11606_2010_1472_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Efficacy and safety of tunneled pleural catheters in adults with malignant pleural effusions: a systematic review.

J Gen Intern Med. 2010-8-10

[2]
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-5-8

[3]
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-4-21

[4]
Pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusions.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004

[5]
Interventions for palliative symptom control in COVID-19 patients.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-8-23

[6]
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19

[7]
Washout policies in long-term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-3-6

[8]
Surgical versus non-surgical management for pleural empyema.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-3-17

[9]
Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-12-2

[10]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22

引用本文的文献

[1]
Indwelling pleural catheter for malignant pleural effusion: a real-life experience in a tertiary centre with a dedicated pleural service in the Republic of Ireland.

Ir J Med Sci. 2025-7-15

[2]
Clinical outcomes of caregiver-led indwelling pleural catheter care and drainage at a Singapore tertiary referral hospital.

J Thorac Dis. 2025-3-31

[3]
Development a predictive nomogram for spontaneous pleurodesis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and malignant pleural effusion.

J Thorac Dis. 2025-2-28

[4]
Radiotherapy of the pleural cavity in patients with primary and secondary malignancies of the pleura.

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2024-10-3

[5]
Malignant Pleural Effusion: A Multidisciplinary Approach.

Open Respir Arch. 2024-6-19

[6]
Comparison of outcomes of surgical and other invasive treatment modalities for malignant pleural effusion in patients with pleural carcinomatosis.

J Thorac Dis. 2024-2-29

[7]
Cardiac related pleural effusions: a narrative review.

J Thorac Dis. 2024-2-29

[8]
Malignant pleural disease.

Breathe (Sheff). 2023-12

[9]
Extending the indications for indwelling pleural catheters: a tube for all seasons.

J Thorac Dis. 2023-7-31

[10]
Indwelling pleural catheters for persistent pleural effusions secondary to post lung resection for malignancies.

J Thorac Dis. 2023-5-30

本文引用的文献

[1]
Diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural effusion: a systematic literature review and new approaches.

Am J Clin Oncol. 2010-8

[2]
Treatment of malignant pleural effusion: PleuRx catheter or talc pleurodesis? A cost-effectiveness analysis.

J Palliat Med. 2010-1

[3]
Ambulatory intercostal drainage for the management of malignant pleural effusion: a single center experience.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2009-9-24

[4]
The new lung cancer staging system.

Chest. 2009-7

[5]
Treatment options for malignant pleural effusion.

Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2009-7

[6]
Recurrent pleural effusion: who benefits from a tunneled pleural catheter?

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009-2

[7]
Outpatient management of malignant pleural effusion with chronic pleural catheter.

Palliat Med. 2008-9

[8]
Long-term indwelling pleural catheter (PleurX) for malignant pleural effusion unsuitable for talc pleurodesis.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009-5

[9]
Efficacy of iodopovidone pleurodesis and comparison of small-bore catheter versus large-bore chest tube.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2008-9

[10]
Pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion: talc, toxicity and where next?

Thorax. 2008-7

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索