Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, Northern Territory 0811, Australia.
Int J Equity Health. 2010 Aug 10;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-9-18.
Asthma is more common among Indigenous than non-Indigenous Australian adults, but little is known about socioeconomic patterning of asthma within the Indigenous population, or whether it is similar to the non-Indigenous population.
I analysed weighted data on self-reported current diagnosed asthma and a range of socio-economic and demographic measures for 5,417 Indigenous and 15,432 non-Indigenous adults aged 18-64 years from two nationally representative surveys conducted in parallel by the Australian Bureau of Statistics in 2004-05.
Current asthma prevalence was higher for Indigenous than non-Indigenous people in every age group. After adjusting for age and sex, main language and place of residence were significantly associated with asthma prevalence in both populations. Traditional SES variables such as education, income and employment status were significantly associated with asthma in the non-Indigenous but not the Indigenous population. For example, age-and sex-adjusted relative odds of asthma among those who did not complete Year 10 (versus those who did) was 1.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-1.5) in the non-Indigenous population versus 1.0 (95% CI 0.8-1.3) in the Indigenous population.
The socioeconomic patterning of asthma among Indigenous Australians is much less pronounced than for other chronic diseases such as diabetes and kidney disease, and contrasts with asthma patterns in the non-Indigenous population. This may be due in part to the episodic nature of asthma, and the well-known challenges in diagnosing it, especially among people with limited health literacy and/or limited access to health care, both of which are more likely in the Indigenous population. It may also reflect the importance of exposures occurring across the socioeconomic spectrum among Indigenous Australians, such as racism, and discrimination, marginalization and dispossession, chronic stress and exposure to violence.
哮喘在澳大利亚原住民成年人中比非原住民更为常见,但对于原住民人群中哮喘的社会经济模式,或者其与非原住民人群的模式是否相似,知之甚少。
我分析了澳大利亚统计局在 2004-05 年同期进行的两项全国代表性调查中,5417 名 18-64 岁的原住民和 15432 名非原住民成年人的自我报告当前确诊哮喘和一系列社会经济及人口统计数据。
在每个年龄组中,当前哮喘的患病率在原住民中都高于非原住民。在调整年龄和性别后,主要语言和居住地在两个群体中都与哮喘的患病率显著相关。传统 SES 变量(如教育、收入和就业状况)在非原住民中与哮喘显著相关,但在原住民中则不然。例如,在非原住民中,与完成 10 年级(相对于完成)的人相比,未完成 10 年级的人患哮喘的年龄和性别调整相对几率为 1.2(95%置信区间 1.0-1.5),而在原住民中为 1.0(95%置信区间 0.8-1.3)。
与糖尿病和肾病等其他慢性疾病相比,澳大利亚原住民中哮喘的社会经济模式要小得多,与非原住民人群中的哮喘模式形成对比。这可能部分归因于哮喘的发作性质,以及在文化程度较低和/或获得医疗保健机会有限的人群中,尤其是在原住民中,诊断哮喘的明显挑战。这也可能反映了在澳大利亚原住民中,种族主义、歧视、边缘化和剥夺、慢性压力和暴力暴露等在整个社会经济范围内发生的暴露的重要性。