Ebesutani Chad, Bernstein Adam, Nakamura Brad J, Chorpita Bruce F, Higa-McMillan Charmaine K, Weisz John R
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2010 Sep;32(3):373-384. doi: 10.1007/s10862-009-9174-9. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
This study used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology and discriminative analyses to examine the correspondence of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) rationally-derived DSM-oriented scales and empirically-derived syndrome scales with clinical diagnoses in a clinic-referred sample of children and adolescents (N = 476). Although results demonstrated that the CBCL Anxiety, Affective, Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity, Oppositional and Conduct Problems DSM-oriented scales corresponded significantly with related clinical diagnoses derived from parent-based structured interviews, these DSM-oriented scales did not evidence significantly greater correspondence with clinical diagnoses than the syndrome scales in all cases but one. The DSM-oriented Anxiety Problems scale was the only scale that evidenced significantly greater correspondence with diagnoses above its syndrome scale counterpart -the Anxious/Depressed scale. The recently developed and rationally-derived DSM-oriented scales thus generally do not add incremental clinical utility above that already afforded by the syndrome scales with respect to corresponding with diagnoses. Implications of these findings are discussed.
本研究采用接受者操作特征(ROC)方法和判别分析,以检验儿童行为清单(CBCL)基于理性推导的面向DSM的量表和基于实证推导的综合征量表与转诊至诊所的儿童和青少年样本(N = 476)的临床诊断之间的对应关系。尽管结果表明,CBCL焦虑、情感、注意力缺陷/多动、对立和品行问题面向DSM的量表与基于家长的结构化访谈得出的相关临床诊断显著对应,但在所有情况中,除了一种情况外,这些面向DSM的量表与临床诊断的对应性并不比综合征量表显著更高。面向DSM的焦虑问题量表是唯一一个与诊断的对应性显著高于其综合征量表对应物——焦虑/抑郁量表的量表。因此,就与诊断的对应性而言,最近开发的基于理性推导的面向DSM的量表通常并未比综合征量表提供更多的临床实用价值。本文讨论了这些发现的意义。