Suppr超能文献

针对5至16岁中国在校学生的大样本,CBCL DSM导向量表的诊断效率及心理测量特性

Diagnostic efficiency and psychometric properties of CBCL DSM-oriented scales in a large sample of Chinese school-attending students aged 5-16.

作者信息

Jiang Zhongliang, Wang Duo, Xu Hui, Zhang Anyi, Zhao Qing, Yan Junjuan, Wang Xianbin, Zhang Wenyan, Li Yanlin, Yang Kai, Hu Shujin, Cui Yonghua, Li Ying

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.

Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Centre for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.

出版信息

Asian J Psychiatr. 2023 Oct;88:103724. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2023.103724. Epub 2023 Aug 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children and adolescents are vulnerable to various psychiatric disorders during the critical phase of individual development. In China, the child behavior checklist (CBCL) is a widely employed psychometric questionnaire for assessing children and adolescents. However, further validation of the psychometric properties and diagnostic effectiveness of the CBCL DSM-oriented scales is necessary. These scales were developed based on DSM diagnosis and require evaluation using a substantial sample of Chinese individuals.

METHODS

This study involved the analysis of a substantial dataset consisting of 72,109 samples collected from five provinces in China. Data was gathered using the CBCL (Parent Rating Scale), and rigorous assessments of reliability and validity were conducted. The mini-international neuropsychiatric interview for children and adolescents (MINI-KID) and the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders-IV (DSM-IV) interview were employed to diagnose the participants. To ensure the accuracy of the diagnoses, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curves) were utilized, and the Youden Index was calculated to determine the appropriate diagnostic cut-off point for each specific target diagnosis.

RESULTS

The study included a total sample of 72,109 cases, out of which 19,782 cases underwent MINI-KID assessment and structured or semi-structured interviews based on DSM-IV to clarify the diagnosis. Reliability and validity analyses showed that the reliability of the subscales and total scales was good, except for Anxiety Problems. The Cronbach's alpha for the CBCL DSM-oriented scales was 0.92. In addition, the validity of all scales was good (CFI = 0.80). For the sample with a clear diagnosis, all five subscales of the CBCL DSM-oriented scales showed fair diagnostic efficiency for the target diagnosis. Among them, the area under curves (AUC) of Mood disorder, Anxiety, Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and Conduct disorder (CD) are 0.80, 0.74, 0.75, 0.74, 0.74. Among the three sample groups, the highest diagnostic efficiency was found in Affective Problems to Mania. The diagnostic cut-off point for each subscale on target diagnoses was clearly defined.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the reliability, validity and diagnostic efficiency of CBCL DSM-oriented scales in Chinese children and adolescents were within acceptable limits. In addition, we used ROC curves and cut-off points to predict the cut-off values of common child and adolescent psychiatric disorders mentioned in the CBCL DSM-oriented scales. This provides an important reference for the clinical application of the CBCL DSM-oriented scales in Chinese samples.

摘要

背景

儿童和青少年在个体发育的关键阶段易患各种精神障碍。在中国,儿童行为检查表(CBCL)是一种广泛用于评估儿童和青少年的心理测量问卷。然而,有必要进一步验证CBCL面向DSM的量表的心理测量特性和诊断有效性。这些量表是基于DSM诊断开发的,需要使用大量中国个体样本进行评估。

方法

本研究对从中国五个省份收集的72109个样本组成的大量数据集进行了分析。使用CBCL(家长评定量表)收集数据,并进行了严格的信效度评估。采用儿童和青少年用迷你国际神经精神访谈量表(MINI-KID)以及《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)访谈来对参与者进行诊断。为确保诊断的准确性,使用了受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线),并计算约登指数以确定每个特定目标诊断的合适诊断切点。

结果

该研究共纳入72109例样本,其中19782例接受了MINI-KID评估以及基于DSM-IV的结构化或半结构化访谈以明确诊断。信效度分析表明除了焦虑问题外,各分量表和总量表的信度良好。CBCL面向DSM的量表的克朗巴哈系数为0.92。此外,所有量表的效度良好(CFI = 0.80)。对于诊断明确的样本,CBCL面向DSM的量表的所有五个分量表对目标诊断均显示出尚可的诊断效率。其中,情绪障碍、焦虑、注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)、对立违抗障碍(ODD)和品行障碍(CD)的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.80、0.7,4、0.75、0.74、0.74。在三个样本组中,情感问题至躁狂的诊断效率最高。明确界定了每个分量表针对目标诊断的诊断切点。

结论

总体而言,CBCL面向DSM的量表在中国儿童和青少年中的信度、效度和诊断效率在可接受范围内。此外,我们使用ROC曲线和切点来预测CBCL面向DSM的量表中提及的常见儿童和青少年精神障碍的切点值。这为CBCL面向DSM的量表在中国样本中的临床应用提供了重要参考。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验