Suppr超能文献

多发伤中主要骨折的确定性固定时机——美国和欧洲一级中心的配对比较:多发伤中当前骨折处理实践的分析。

The timing of definitive fixation for major fractures in polytrauma--a matched-pair comparison between a US and European level I centres: analysis of current fracture management practice in polytrauma.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Trauma, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.

出版信息

Injury. 2011 Jul;42(7):650-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.07.248. Epub 2010 Aug 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Early definitive stabilisation is usually the treatment of choice for major fractures in polytrauma patients. Modifications may be made when patients are in critical condition, or when associated injuries dictate the timing of surgery. The current study investigates whether the timing of fracture treatment is different in different trauma systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients treated a Level I trauma centre were documented (Group US) and a matched-pair group was gathered from the German Trauma Registry (Group GTR).

INCLUSION CRITERIA

New Injury Severity Score (NISS)>16, >2 major fractures and >1 organ/soft tissue injury. The timing and type of surgery for major fractures was recorded, as were major complications.

RESULTS

114 patients were included, n=57 Group US (35.1% F, 64.9% M, mean age: 44.1 yrs±16.49, mean NISS: 27.4±8.65, mean ICU stay: 10±7.49) and n=57 Group GTR (36.8% F, 63.1% M, mean age: 41.2 yrs±15.35, mean NISS: 29.4±6.88, mean ICU stay: 15.6±18.25). 44 (57.1%) out of 77 fractures in Group US received primary definitive fracture fixation compared to 61 (65.5%) out of 93 fractures in Group GTR (n.s.). The average duration until definitive treatment was comparable in all major extremity fractures (pelvis: 5 days±2.8 Group US, 7.1 days±9.6 Group GTR (n.s.), femur: 7.9 days±8.3 Group US, 5.5 days±7.9 (n.s.), tibia: 6.2 days±5.6 Group US, 6.2 days±9.1 Group GTR (n.s.), humerus: 5 days±3.7 Group US, 6.6 days±6.1 Group GTR (n.s.), radius: 6 days±4.7 Group US, 6.1 days±8.7 Group GTR (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

The current matched-pair analysis demonstrates that the timing of initial definitive fixation of major fractures is comparable between the US and Europe. Certain fractures are stabilised internally in a staged fashion regardless the trauma system, thus discounting previous apparent contradictions.

摘要

目的

对于多发创伤患者,早期确定性稳定通常是主要骨折的首选治疗方法。当患者处于危急状态时,或者当相关损伤决定手术时机时,可能会进行修改。本研究旨在探讨不同创伤系统中骨折治疗的时机是否不同。

材料和方法

连续记录在一级创伤中心治疗的患者(美国组),并从德国创伤登记处收集匹配对组(GTR 组)。

纳入标准

新损伤严重程度评分(NISS)>16、>2 处主要骨折和>1 处器官/软组织损伤。记录主要骨折的手术时机和类型,以及主要并发症。

结果

共纳入 114 例患者,美国组 57 例(女性 35.1%,男性 64.9%,平均年龄 44.1 岁±16.49,平均 NISS 27.4±8.65,平均 ICU 住院时间 10±7.49),GTR 组 57 例(女性 36.8%,男性 63.1%,平均年龄 41.2 岁±15.35,平均 NISS 29.4±6.88,平均 ICU 住院时间 15.6±18.25)。美国组 77 处骨折中有 44 处(57.1%)接受了初次确定性骨折固定,而 GTR 组 93 处骨折中有 61 处(65.5%)(无统计学意义)。所有主要四肢骨折的确定性治疗平均时间相似(骨盆:美国组 5 天±2.8,GTR 组 7.1 天±9.6(无统计学意义),股骨:美国组 7.9 天±8.3,GTR 组 5.5 天±7.9(无统计学意义),胫骨:美国组 6.2 天±5.6,GTR 组 6.2 天±9.1(无统计学意义),肱骨:美国组 5 天±3.7,GTR 组 6.6 天±6.1(无统计学意义),桡骨:美国组 6 天±4.7,GTR 组 6.1 天±8.7(无统计学意义)。

结论

目前的配对分析表明,美国和欧洲初始确定性固定主要骨折的时机相似。某些骨折无论创伤系统如何,都以分期方式进行内部稳定,从而消除了先前明显的矛盾。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验