Muranaka Hiroyuki, Horiguchi Takayoshi, Ueda Yoshitake, Usui Shuji, Tanki Nobuyoshi, Nakamura Osamu
Department of Radiology, Hiroshima City General Rehabilitation Center.
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2010 Jul 20;66(7):725-33. doi: 10.6009/jjrt.66.725.
We evaluate radiofrequency (RF) heating of two kinds of hip joint implants of different sizes, shapes and materials. Temperature rises at various positions of each implant are measured and compared with a computer simulation based on electromagnetic-field analysis.
Two kinds of implants made of cobalt-chromium alloy and titanium alloy were embedded at a 2-cm depth of tissue-equivalent gel-phantom. The phantom was placed parallel to the static magnetic field of a 1.5 T MRI device. Scans were conducted at the specific absorption rate of 2.5 W/kg for 15 min, and temperatures were recorded with RF-transparent fiberoptic sensors. Temperatures of the implant surface were measured at 6 positions, from the tip to the head. Measured temperature rises were compared with the results of electromagnetic-field analysis.
The maximum temperature rise was observed at the tip of each implant, and it was 9.0 degrees C for the cobalt- chromium implant and 5.3 degrees C for the titanium implant. The simulated heating positions with electromagnetic-field analysis accorded with experimental results. However, a difference in temperature rise was seen with the titanium implant.
RF heating was confirmed to take place at both ends of the implants in spite of their different shapes. The maximum temperature rise was observed at the tip where there is large curvature. The value was found to depend on physical properties of the implant materials. The discrepancy between experimental and simulated temperature rises was presumed to be the result of an incomplete model for the titanium implant.
我们评估不同尺寸、形状和材料的两种髋关节植入物的射频(RF)加热情况。测量每种植入物不同位置的温度升高,并与基于电磁场分析的计算机模拟结果进行比较。
将两种由钴铬合金和钛合金制成的植入物嵌入组织等效凝胶体模2厘米深处。体模与1.5T MRI设备的静磁场平行放置。以2.5W/kg的比吸收率进行扫描15分钟,并用射频透明光纤传感器记录温度。在从尖端到头部的6个位置测量植入物表面的温度。将测量的温度升高与电磁场分析结果进行比较。
在每种植入物的尖端观察到最大温度升高,钴铬植入物为9.0℃,钛植入物为5.3℃。电磁场分析模拟的加热位置与实验结果一致。然而,钛植入物的温度升高存在差异。
尽管植入物形状不同,但证实两端均发生射频加热。在曲率大的尖端观察到最大温度升高。发现该值取决于植入物材料的物理特性。实验和模拟温度升高之间的差异被认为是钛植入物模型不完整的结果。