Suppr超能文献

学龄前儿童视力筛查:数据是否支持普遍筛查?

Vision screening in preschool children: do the data support universal screening?

机构信息

Universitäts-Augenklinik Freiburg.

出版信息

Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Jul;107(28-29):495-9. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0495. Epub 2010 Jul 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive, systematic reviews on the benefit of vision screening in preschool children were published in 2008 by major national organizations in both Germany and the United Kingdom. These reviews raised public interest in the topic.

METHODS

This article contains a discussion of the sensitivity, specificity, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of preschool vision screening, on the basis of the two national reports mentioned above as well as relevant literature retrieved by a selective PubMed search.

RESULTS

All studies that have been published to date on the efficacy of preschool visual screening suffer from methodological flaws. The available data suggest a benefit from screening, though this has not been proven. Model calculations reveal that the positive predictive value of screening tests performed in isolation is inadequate. The authors of the two national reports applied different methods and arrived at similar, but not identical conclusions. Preschool vision screening may also be cost-effective; whether this is the case or not depends on the probability of a long-term benefit--specifically, on the probability of preventing bilateral loss of vision in adulthood. To prevent one such case, it is estimated that 13 cases of childhood amblyopia must be identified and successfully treated (number needed to treat [NNT] = 13).

CONCLUSION

The available data do not allow any firm conclusion about the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of preschool vision screening. Further clinical studies are needed to answer these questions.

摘要

背景

2008 年,德国和英国的主要国家组织发表了关于学龄前儿童视力筛查益处的全面、系统评价。这些综述引起了公众对该主题的兴趣。

方法

本文基于上述两份国家报告以及通过选择性 PubMed 搜索检索到的相关文献,讨论了学龄前视力筛查的敏感性、特异性、疗效和成本效益。

结果

迄今为止,所有关于学龄前视觉筛查效果的已发表研究都存在方法学缺陷。现有数据表明筛查有一定益处,但尚未得到证实。模型计算表明,单独进行的筛查测试的阳性预测值不足。两份国家报告的作者采用了不同的方法,得出了相似但不完全相同的结论。学龄前视力筛查也可能具有成本效益;是否如此取决于长期受益的可能性——具体而言,取决于预防成年后双眼视力丧失的可能性。为了预防这样的情况,估计需要识别和成功治疗 13 例儿童弱视(需要治疗的数量 [NNT] = 13)。

结论

现有数据无法对学龄前视力筛查的疗效和成本效益得出任何明确的结论。需要进一步的临床研究来回答这些问题。

相似文献

1
2
Children with problems at school.在学校存在问题的儿童。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Jan;108(3):39; author reply 40. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0039a. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
3
Early start of screening.早期开始筛查。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Jan;108(3):39; author reply 40. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0039b. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
8
The potential cost-effectiveness of amblyopia screening programs.弱视筛查项目的潜在成本效益。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2012 May-Jun;49(3):146-55; quiz 145, 156. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20110823-02. Epub 2011 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Vision screening for amblyopia in childhood.儿童弱视的视力筛查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD005020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005020.pub3.
2
[Guidelines for ophthalmologic screening of premature infants].[早产儿眼科筛查指南]
Ophthalmologe. 2008 Oct;105(10):955-63. doi: 10.1007/s00347-008-1841-9.
6
[Cost-effectiveness of screening for amblyopia].[弱视筛查的成本效益]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2005 Feb;222(2):110-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813905.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验