• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学龄前儿童视力筛查:数据是否支持普遍筛查?

Vision screening in preschool children: do the data support universal screening?

机构信息

Universitäts-Augenklinik Freiburg.

出版信息

Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Jul;107(28-29):495-9. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0495. Epub 2010 Jul 12.

DOI:10.3238/arztebl.2010.0495
PMID:20703333
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2915478/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive, systematic reviews on the benefit of vision screening in preschool children were published in 2008 by major national organizations in both Germany and the United Kingdom. These reviews raised public interest in the topic.

METHODS

This article contains a discussion of the sensitivity, specificity, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of preschool vision screening, on the basis of the two national reports mentioned above as well as relevant literature retrieved by a selective PubMed search.

RESULTS

All studies that have been published to date on the efficacy of preschool visual screening suffer from methodological flaws. The available data suggest a benefit from screening, though this has not been proven. Model calculations reveal that the positive predictive value of screening tests performed in isolation is inadequate. The authors of the two national reports applied different methods and arrived at similar, but not identical conclusions. Preschool vision screening may also be cost-effective; whether this is the case or not depends on the probability of a long-term benefit--specifically, on the probability of preventing bilateral loss of vision in adulthood. To prevent one such case, it is estimated that 13 cases of childhood amblyopia must be identified and successfully treated (number needed to treat [NNT] = 13).

CONCLUSION

The available data do not allow any firm conclusion about the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of preschool vision screening. Further clinical studies are needed to answer these questions.

摘要

背景

2008 年,德国和英国的主要国家组织发表了关于学龄前儿童视力筛查益处的全面、系统评价。这些综述引起了公众对该主题的兴趣。

方法

本文基于上述两份国家报告以及通过选择性 PubMed 搜索检索到的相关文献,讨论了学龄前视力筛查的敏感性、特异性、疗效和成本效益。

结果

迄今为止,所有关于学龄前视觉筛查效果的已发表研究都存在方法学缺陷。现有数据表明筛查有一定益处,但尚未得到证实。模型计算表明,单独进行的筛查测试的阳性预测值不足。两份国家报告的作者采用了不同的方法,得出了相似但不完全相同的结论。学龄前视力筛查也可能具有成本效益;是否如此取决于长期受益的可能性——具体而言,取决于预防成年后双眼视力丧失的可能性。为了预防这样的情况,估计需要识别和成功治疗 13 例儿童弱视(需要治疗的数量 [NNT] = 13)。

结论

现有数据无法对学龄前视力筛查的疗效和成本效益得出任何明确的结论。需要进一步的临床研究来回答这些问题。

相似文献

1
Vision screening in preschool children: do the data support universal screening?学龄前儿童视力筛查:数据是否支持普遍筛查?
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Jul;107(28-29):495-9. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0495. Epub 2010 Jul 12.
2
Children with problems at school.在学校存在问题的儿童。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Jan;108(3):39; author reply 40. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0039a. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
3
Early start of screening.早期开始筛查。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Jan;108(3):39; author reply 40. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0039b. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
4
[Vision screening of children: rational and cost effective].儿童视力筛查:合理且具成本效益
Versicherungsmedizin. 2013 Dec 1;65(4):207.
5
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening programmes for amblyopia and strabismus in children up to the age of 4-5 years: a systematic review and economic evaluation.针对4至5岁以下儿童的弱视和斜视筛查项目的临床有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(25):iii, xi-194. doi: 10.3310/hta12250.
6
Validation and cost-effectiveness of a home-based screening system for amblyopia.基于家庭的弱视筛查系统的验证和成本效益分析。
Ophthalmology. 2012 Jun;119(6):1265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.027. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
7
[Cost effectiveness of mass orthoptic screening in kindergarten for early detection of developmental vision disorders].[幼儿园大规模斜视筛查对早期发现发育性视力障碍的成本效益分析]
Gesundheitswesen. 2000 Apr;62(4):196-206. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-10859.
8
The potential cost-effectiveness of amblyopia screening programs.弱视筛查项目的潜在成本效益。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2012 May-Jun;49(3):146-55; quiz 145, 156. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20110823-02. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
9
Cost-effectiveness of orthoptic screening in kindergarten: a decision-analytic model.幼儿园斜视筛查的成本效益:一项决策分析模型
Strabismus. 2000 Jun;8(2):79-90.
10
A cost-effectiveness model of screening strategies for amblyopia and risk factors and its application in a german setting.弱视及危险因素筛查策略的成本效益模型及其在德国环境中的应用。
Optom Vis Sci. 2003 Mar;80(3):259-69. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200303000-00016.

引用本文的文献

1
Integration of smartphone technology and artificial intelligence for advanced ophthalmic care: A systematic review.智能手机技术与人工智能在高级眼科护理中的整合:一项系统综述。
Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res. 2024 Mar 25;4(3):120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.aopr.2024.03.003. eCollection 2024 Aug-Sep.
2
Economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review.经济评估视屏筛查在儿童弱视和屈光不正中的应用:系统综述。
Can J Public Health. 2022 Apr;113(2):297-311. doi: 10.17269/s41997-021-00572-x. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
3
Instrument-based screening for amblyopia risk factors in a primary care setting in children aged 18 to 30 months.在 18 至 30 个月大的儿童的初级保健环境中,基于仪器的斜视风险因素筛查。
Eur J Pediatr. 2021 May;180(5):1521-1527. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03904-0. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
4
Comparison between two autorefractor performances in large scale vision screening in Chinese school age children.两种自动验光仪在中国学龄儿童大规模视力筛查中的性能比较。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 18;13(10):1660-1666. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2020.10.22. eCollection 2020.
5
Evaluation of the pediatric-centered integrated care AOK Junior: protocol for a mixed-method study.评价以儿科为中心的整合护理 AOK Junior:一项混合方法研究的方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 16;20(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05088-7.
6
Performance of Photoscreener in Detection of Refractive Error in All Age Groups and Amblyopia Risk Factors in Children in a Tribal District of Odisha: The Tribal Odisha Eye Disease Study (TOES) # 3.照片筛查仪在奥里萨邦一个部落地区所有年龄组屈光不正检测及儿童弱视危险因素检测中的表现:奥里萨邦部落眼病研究(TOES)#3
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Jun 4;7(3):12. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.3.12. eCollection 2018 May.
7
A comparison of the Plusoptix S09 with an autorefractometer of noncycloplegics and cycloplegics in children.儿童中Plusoptix S09与非睫状肌麻痹和睫状肌麻痹自动验光仪的比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(35):e4596. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004596.
8
[Comparison of two visual acuity tests in school enrolment examinations : Tumbling E test versus Freiburg visual acuity test].入学考试中两种视力测试的比较:翻E视力表测试与弗莱堡视力测试
Ophthalmologe. 2016 Aug;113(8):684-9. doi: 10.1007/s00347-016-0246-4.
9
Performance of Spot Photoscreener in Detecting Amblyopia Risk Factors in Chinese Pre-school and School Age Children Attending an Eye Clinic.点式照片筛查仪在眼科门诊中国学龄前及学龄儿童弱视危险因素检测中的性能表现
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 16;11(2):e0149561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149561. eCollection 2016.
10
Comparison of photorefraction, autorefractometry and retinoscopy in children.儿童验光、自动验光仪验光和检影验光的比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;34(4):739-46. doi: 10.1007/s10792-013-9864-x. Epub 2013 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Vision screening for amblyopia in childhood.儿童弱视的视力筛查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD005020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005020.pub3.
2
[Guidelines for ophthalmologic screening of premature infants].[早产儿眼科筛查指南]
Ophthalmologe. 2008 Oct;105(10):955-63. doi: 10.1007/s00347-008-1841-9.
3
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening programmes for amblyopia and strabismus in children up to the age of 4-5 years: a systematic review and economic evaluation.针对4至5岁以下儿童的弱视和斜视筛查项目的临床有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(25):iii, xi-194. doi: 10.3310/hta12250.
4
Risk of bilateral visual impairment in individuals with amblyopia: the Rotterdam study.弱视患者双眼视力损害的风险:鹿特丹研究
Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov;91(11):1450-1. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.113670. Epub 2007 May 23.
5
Screening and treating amblyopia: are we making a difference?弱视的筛查与治疗:我们正在产生影响吗?
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 May;48(5):2084-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0089.
6
[Cost-effectiveness of screening for amblyopia].[弱视筛查的成本效益]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2005 Feb;222(2):110-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813905.
7
Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study.在学龄前儿童视力研究中,由持牌眼保健专业人员进行的学龄前视力筛查测试的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2004 Apr;111(4):637-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.01.022.
8
Cost-utility analysis of orthoptic screening in kindergarten: a Markov model based on data from Germany.幼儿园斜视筛查的成本效用分析:基于德国数据的马尔可夫模型
Pediatrics. 2004 Feb;113(2):e95-108. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.2.e95.
9
THE INCIDENCE OF AMBLYOPIA EX ANOPSIA IN YOUNG ADULT MALES IN MINNESOTA IN 1962-63.1962 - 1963年明尼苏达州年轻成年男性中废用性弱视的发病率。
Am J Ophthalmol. 1965 Jul;60:75-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(65)92394-9.
10
The problem of unilateral amblyopia; a preliminary study of 10,000 National Health patients.单侧弱视问题;对10000名国民健康服务患者的初步研究
Br Med J. 1959 Jan 24;1(5116):202-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5116.202.