Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261, USA.
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Aug 15;44(16):6450-6. doi: 10.1021/es9034478.
Although the environmental impacts and carbon footprints of foods are gaining more public attention and scientific debate, few studies have systematically evaluated the life cycle nitrogen and phosphorus flows among different food types. Disruption of natural nitrogen and phosphorus cycles already result in serious environmental quality degradation and economic losses, such as loss of fisheries due to hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. This study characterizes the nutrient flows during food production, processing, packaging, and distribution stages for eight food types; compares carbon footprints and nitrogen equivalent footprints of food groups; evaluates solutions to reduce excessive nitrogen outputs; and estimates effectiveness and efficiency of possible solutions. Different food groups exhibit a highly variable nitrogen-intensity; on average, red meat and dairy products require much more nitrogen than cereals/carbohydrates. The ranking of foods' nitrogen footprints is not consistent with their carbon footprints. For example, dairy products and chicken/eggs have relatively high nitrogen footprint and low carbon footprints. Finally, the study evaluates shifting food consumption patterns. Dietary shifts from dairy products and red meat to cereals can be an effective approach for lowering the personal nitrogen footprint.
尽管食物的环境影响和碳足迹越来越受到公众关注和科学界的争论,但很少有研究系统地评估不同食物类型之间的生命周期氮磷流动。自然氮磷循环的破坏已经导致严重的环境质量恶化和经济损失,例如由于墨西哥湾缺氧而导致渔业损失。本研究描述了八种食物在生产、加工、包装和分销阶段的养分流动;比较了食物组的碳足迹和氮当量足迹;评估了减少过量氮排放的解决方案;并估计了可能解决方案的有效性和效率。不同的食物组表现出高度可变的氮强度;平均而言,红肉和奶制品比谷物/碳水化合物需要更多的氮。食物氮足迹的排名与碳足迹不一致。例如,奶制品和鸡肉/鸡蛋的氮足迹相对较高,而碳足迹较低。最后,研究评估了改变食物消费模式。从奶制品和红肉转向谷物的饮食转变可以有效降低个人的氮足迹。