Faculty of Dentistry, Ajman University of Science and Technology, Ajman, UAE.
J Oral Rehabil. 2011 Mar;38(3):176-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02143.x.
The purpose of this multicentre observational study was to determine patient satisfaction with either conventional dentures or mandibular 2-implant overdentures in a 'real world' setting. Two hundred and three edentulous patients (mean age 68·8 ± 10·4 years) were recruited at eight centres located in North America, South America and Europe. The patients were provided with new mandibular conventional dentures or implant overdentures supported by two implants and ball attachments. At baseline and at 6 months post-treatment, they rated their satisfaction with their mandibular prostheses on 100-mm visual analogue scale questionnaires. One hundred and two (50·2%) participants had valid baseline and 6-month satisfaction data. Although both groups reported improvements, the implant overdenture group reported significantly higher ratings of overall satisfaction, comfort, stability, ability to speak and ability to chew. These results suggest that edentulous patients who choose mandibular implant overdentures have significantly greater improvements in satisfaction, despite their relatively higher cost, than those who choose new conventional dentures.
本多中心观察性研究的目的是在“真实世界”环境中确定患者对传统全口义齿或下颌 2 颗种植体覆盖义齿的满意度。在北美、南美和欧洲的 8 个中心招募了 203 名无牙颌患者(平均年龄 68.8 ± 10.4 岁)。为这些患者提供了新的下颌传统全口义齿或由两颗种植体和球附着体支撑的下颌种植覆盖义齿。在治疗前和治疗后 6 个月,他们使用 100 毫米视觉模拟量表问卷对下颌义齿的满意度进行评分。102 名(50.2%)参与者具有有效的基线和 6 个月满意度数据。尽管两组患者均报告有所改善,但种植覆盖义齿组在总体满意度、舒适度、稳定性、言语能力和咀嚼能力方面的评分明显更高。这些结果表明,与选择新的传统全口义齿的患者相比,选择下颌种植覆盖义齿的无牙颌患者的满意度有显著提高,尽管其相对成本较高。