• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

助听器验配:专家意见是否必要?

Hearing aid prescribing: is the specialist opinion necessary?

作者信息

Campbell J B, Nigam A

机构信息

Birmingham and Midland Ear, Nose & Throat Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1991 Apr;16(2):124-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1991.tb01959.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2273.1991.tb01959.x
PMID:2070525
Abstract

A restructuring of the service for provision of hearing aids has been proposed by the Royal National Institute for the Deaf. This is based on the assumption that very few patients referred for hearing aids have significant ear disease and it is not necessary for them to see an ENT specialist. The case notes of 200 consecutive patients referred to the Hearing Aid clinic were reviewed. In only half of these would a hearing aid have been prescribed without a specialist opinion. The remainder either did not need a hearing aid or required further investigation and surgical or medical treatment. In addition there was significant evidence of lack of expertise amongst General Practitioners in recognizing ear disorders. It is imperative that any patient requiring a hearing aid be seen by someone experienced in otology rather than be dealt with by the General Practitioner alone.

摘要

英国皇家聋人协会提议对助听器服务进行重组。这是基于这样一种假设,即转介来寻求助听器的患者中很少有人患有严重耳部疾病,他们没有必要去看耳鼻喉科专家。对连续200名转介至助听器诊所的患者的病历进行了审查。在这些患者中,只有一半在没有专家意见的情况下会被开具助听器。其余患者要么不需要助听器,要么需要进一步检查以及手术或药物治疗。此外,有大量证据表明全科医生在识别耳部疾病方面缺乏专业知识。任何需要助听器的患者必须由耳科经验丰富的医生诊治,而不能仅由全科医生处理。

相似文献

1
Hearing aid prescribing: is the specialist opinion necessary?助听器验配:专家意见是否必要?
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1991 Apr;16(2):124-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1991.tb01959.x.
2
Hearing-aids: can they be safely prescribed without medical supervision? An analysis of patients referred for hearing-aids.助听器:能否在无医疗监督的情况下安全开具处方?对转诊至助听器的患者的分析。
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1989 Oct;14(5):415-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1989.tb00396.x.
3
Hearing and balance disorders. How to recognize, when to refer.听力与平衡障碍。如何识别,何时转诊。
Postgrad Med. 1985 Jan;77(1):119-27, 130. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1985.11698844.
4
Children younger than 4 years of age, referred to an audiological department.4岁以下儿童,转诊至听力学科室。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1992 Mar;23(2):161-70. doi: 10.1016/0165-5876(92)90052-q.
5
Provision of hearing aids: does specialist assessment cause delay?助听器的供应:专科评估会导致延迟吗?
BMJ. 1989 Aug 12;299(6696):437-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6696.437.
6
Patient preferences for direct hearing aid provision by a private dispenser. A discrete choice experiment.患者对私人助听器经销商直接提供助听器的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Ear Hear. 2008 Aug;29(4):557-64. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181734a19.
7
[In aches and impaired hearing. More looking into the ear].[存在疼痛和听力受损情况。需进一步检查耳朵]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2008 Jan 17;150(1-2):14-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03365269.
8
Direct hearing aid referrals: a prospective study.直接助听器转诊:一项前瞻性研究。
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1996 Apr;21(2):142-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1996.tb01319.x.
9
Hearing aids: family practitioner referral patterns.助听器:家庭医生的转诊模式。
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1992 Apr;17(2):146-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1992.tb01062.x.
10
Quality improvement in action. Direct general practitioner referrals to audiology for the provision of hearing aids: a single centre review.实际中的质量改进。全科医生直接转诊至听力学部门以提供助听器:一项单中心回顾研究。
Qual Prim Care. 2010;18(3):201-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of an audiology clinic in one general practice.一家听力诊所对一家全科诊所的影响。
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Oct;47(423):643-4.