• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肱骨头上版本的可靠预测:基于 CT 的验证研究。

Metaversion can reliably predict humeral head version: a computed tomography-based validation study.

机构信息

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Western Ontario, Hand and Upper Limb Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Dec;19(8):1145-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.04.047. Epub 2010 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2010.04.047
PMID:20705489
Abstract

HYPOTHESIS

Circumstances occur when the determination of anatomic humeral head version is difficult. In the setting of irreparable proximal humeral fracture, there are few reliable intraoperative landmarks to determine anatomic humeral head version. This study tested our hypothesis that the metaphyseal version (metaversion) is a landmark that can assist with correct head version and used computed tomography (CT) to evaluate its reliability as a predictor of anatomic version.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT scans from 50 consecutive patients (20 women, 30 men) were examined using commercial software. Patients were a mean age of 46 years (range, 17-85 years). Exclusion criteria included previous fracture, arthritis, or humeral deformity. The metaversion and humeral head version were measured. Measurements were conducted independently by 2 surgeons blinded to the results of the other. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation.

RESULTS

The mean difference between the metaversion and the humeral head version was 2.5° (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9°-3.9°). The mean difference between metaversion and humeral head version was 1.8° (95% CI, 0.0°-3.6°) in women, 2.9° (95% CI, 0.6°-5.1°) in men, 2.4° (95% CI: 0.6°-4.1°) in right shoulders, and 2.5° (95% CI, -0.1° to 5.1°) in left shoulders. Interrater and intrarater reliability was excellent, 0.97 and 0.98, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal humeral metaphyseal version (metaversion) is an accurate predictor of ipsilateral humeral head version.

摘要

假设

在确定解剖肱骨头版本有困难的情况下,会出现一些情况。在不可修复的肱骨近端骨折的情况下,很少有可靠的术中标志来确定解剖肱骨头版本。本研究检验了我们的假设,即干骺端版本(metaversion)是一个可以辅助正确头版本的标志,并使用计算机断层扫描(CT)来评估其作为解剖版本预测指标的可靠性。

材料和方法

使用商业软件检查了 50 例连续患者(20 名女性,30 名男性)的 CT 扫描。患者的平均年龄为 46 岁(范围,17-85 岁)。排除标准包括先前骨折、关节炎或肱骨畸形。测量干骺端版本和肱骨头版本。两位外科医生在不知道其他结果的情况下独立进行测量。使用组内相关系数计算观察者间和观察者内可靠性。

结果

metaversion 和肱骨头版本之间的平均差异为 2.5°(95%置信区间[CI],0.9°-3.9°)。女性的 metaversion 和肱骨头版本之间的平均差异为 1.8°(95% CI,0.0°-3.6°),男性为 2.9°(95% CI,0.6°-5.1°),右侧为 2.4°(95% CI:0.6°-4.1°),左侧为 2.5°(95% CI,-0.1°-5.1°)。观察者间和观察者内可靠性均为优秀,分别为 0.97 和 0.98。

结论

肱骨近端干骺端版本(metaversion)是同侧肱骨头版本的准确预测指标。

相似文献

1
Metaversion can reliably predict humeral head version: a computed tomography-based validation study.肱骨头上版本的可靠预测:基于 CT 的验证研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Dec;19(8):1145-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.04.047. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
2
Humeral head sizing using extra-articular landmarks on conventional radiographs.利用传统X线片上的关节外标志进行肱骨头大小测量。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2017 Sep;39(9):999-1004. doi: 10.1007/s00276-017-1833-z. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
3
Measurement Methods for Humeral Retroversion Using Two-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scans: Which Is Most Concordant with the Standard Method?使用二维计算机断层扫描测量肱骨扭转的方法:哪种方法与标准方法最一致?
Clin Orthop Surg. 2017 Jun;9(2):223-231. doi: 10.4055/cios.2017.9.2.223. Epub 2017 May 8.
4
A Novel Method for the Approximation of Humeral Head Retrotorsion Based on Three-Dimensional Registration of the Bicipital Groove.基于肱二头肌沟三维配准的肱骨小头骨后旋转近似新方法。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Aug 1;100(15):e101. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01561.
5
Computed tomography-based prediction of the straight antegrade humeral nail's entry point and exposure of "critical types": truth or fiction?基于计算机断层扫描对直型顺行肱骨钉入点及“关键类型”显露情况的预测:是真还是假?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 May;26(5):902-908. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.10.021. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
6
Development of the humeral head offset index for control of humeral torsion.肱骨头偏移指数的发展用于控制肱骨扭转。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Sep 9;25(1):724. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07812-4.
7
[Three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus and rotator cuff attachment and its utilization in shoulder arthroplasty].[肱骨近端及肩袖附着点的三维几何学及其在肩关节置换术中的应用]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006 Apr;73(2):77-84.
8
Quantification of humeral head deformity following neonatal brachial plexus palsy.新生儿臂丛神经麻痹后肱骨头畸形的定量评估。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 19;94(18):e136(1-8). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00540.
9
Reliability and validity in measurement of true humeral retroversion by a three-dimensional cylinder fitting method.通过三维圆柱拟合方法测量肱骨真正后倾角的可靠性和有效性。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 May;24(5):809-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.09.041. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
10
[Computed tomographic analysis of humeral retrotorsion and glenoid retroversion].[肱骨后扭转和肩胛盂后倾的计算机断层扫描分析]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2002 Oct;88(6):553-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures with conservation of the whole humeral head as autograft: does it improve greater tuberosity healing?肱骨近端骨折的半关节成形术保留整个肱骨头作为自体移植物:是否能改善大结节愈合?
Int Orthop. 2019 May;43(5):1155-1164. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3995-7. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
2
Measurement Methods for Humeral Retroversion Using Two-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scans: Which Is Most Concordant with the Standard Method?使用二维计算机断层扫描测量肱骨扭转的方法:哪种方法与标准方法最一致?
Clin Orthop Surg. 2017 Jun;9(2):223-231. doi: 10.4055/cios.2017.9.2.223. Epub 2017 May 8.