Suppr超能文献

超声与神经刺激仪引导下正中神经和尺神经阻滞的最小有效容积的评估及其药效学后果:一项随机、双盲、对照比较研究。

Estimation and pharmacodynamic consequences of the minimum effective anesthetic volumes for median and ulnar nerve blocks: a randomized, double-blind, controlled comparison between ultrasound and nerve stimulation guidance.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Lapeyronie University Hospital, Route de Ganges, France.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2010 Oct;111(4):1059-64. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181eb6372. Epub 2010 Aug 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nerve stimulation and ultrasound guidance are the most popular techniques for peripheral nerve blocks. However, the minimum effective anesthetic volume (MEAV) in selected nerves for both techniques and the consequences of decreasing the local anesthetic volume on the pharmacodynamic characteristics of nerve block remain unstudied. We designed a randomized, double-blind controlled comparison between neurostimulation and ultrasound guidance to estimate the MEAV of 1.5% mepivacaine and pharmacodynamics in median and ulnar nerve blocks.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for carpal tunnel release were randomized to ultrasound guidance (UG) or neurostimulation (NS) groups. A step-up/step-down study model (Dixon method) was used to determine the MEAV with nonprobability sequential dosing based on the outcome of the previous patient. The starting dose of 1.5% mepivacaine was 13 and 11 mL for median and ulnar nerves at the humeral canal. Block success/failure resulted in a decrease/increase of 2 mL. A blinded physician assessed sensory blockade at 2-minute intervals for 20 minutes. Block onset time and duration were noted.

RESULTS

The MEAV50 (SD) of the median nerve was lower in the UG group 2 (0.1) mL (95% confidence interval [CI] = [1, 96] to [2, 04]) than in the NS group 4 (3.8) mL (95% CI = [2, 4] to [5, 6]) (P = 0.017). There was no difference for the ulnar nerve between UG group 2 (0.1) mL (95% CI = [1, 96] to [2, 04]) and NS group 2.4 (0.6) mL (95% CI = [2, 1] to [2, 7]). The duration of sensory blockade was significantly correlated to local anesthetic volume, but onset time was not modified.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound guidance selectively provided a 50% reduction in the MEAV of mepivacaine 1.5% for median nerve sensory blockade in comparison with neurostimulation. Decreasing the local anesthetic volume can decrease sensory block duration but not onset time.

摘要

背景

神经刺激和超声引导是外周神经阻滞最常用的技术。然而,这两种技术在选定神经中的最小有效麻醉量(MEAV)以及减少局部麻醉量对神经阻滞药效学特征的影响仍有待研究。我们设计了一项随机、双盲对照研究,比较神经刺激和超声引导,以估计 1.5%甲哌卡因在正中神经和尺神经阻滞中的 MEAV 和药效学。

方法

拟行腕管松解术的患者被随机分为超声引导(UG)或神经刺激(NS)组。采用逐步递增/递减研究模型(Dixon 法),根据前一位患者的结果,基于概率序贯给药来确定 MEAV。正中神经在肱骨管内的起始剂量为 1.5%甲哌卡因 13 和 11 mL,尺神经为 11 和 9 mL。阻滞成功/失败导致 2 mL 的减少/增加。一位盲法医师每 2 分钟评估一次感觉阻滞,共 20 分钟。记录阻滞起效时间和持续时间。

结果

UG 组的 MEAV50(SD)为 2(0.1)mL(95%置信区间 [CI]:[1, 96]至 [2, 04]),明显低于 NS 组的 4(3.8)mL(95% CI:[2, 4]至 [5, 6])(P = 0.017)。在 UG 组和 NS 组 2 中,尺神经的 MEAV50 没有差异,分别为 2(0.1)mL(95% CI:[1, 96]至 [2, 04])和 2.4(0.6)mL(95% CI:[2, 1]至 [2, 7])。感觉阻滞的持续时间与局部麻醉量显著相关,但起效时间没有改变。

结论

与神经刺激相比,超声引导选择性地将 1.5%甲哌卡因用于正中神经感觉阻滞的 MEAV 降低了 50%。减少局部麻醉量可以缩短感觉阻滞持续时间,但不能改变起效时间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验