Fenten Maaike G E, Schoenmakers Karin P W, Heesterbeek Petra J C, Scheffer Gert Jan, Stienstra Rudolf
Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Research Department, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Sep 30;15:130. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0110-0.
BACKGROUND: In what way volume, concentration and dose affect block duration is controversial. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the effect of dose, volume and concentration of mepivacaine on the duration of sensory and motor blockade in ultrasound-guided single shot axillary brachial plexus blockade. METHODS: In this parallel group randomized trial conducted in the Sint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, 45 adult patients undergoing minor orthopaedic forearm, wrist or hand surgery were randomized to 3 groups. Group A: 20 mL mepivacaine 1.5 %, Group B: 30 mL mepivacaine 1 % and Group C: 30 mL mepivacaine 1.5 %. Randomization was computer-generated, with allocation concealment by opaque sequentially numbered sealed envelopes. Patients and observers were blinded to group allocation. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: duration of sensory block. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were randomized, four patients were excluded and replaced, and 15 patients in each group were included in the analysis. Mean (95 % CI) sensory and motor block duration was 256 (230-282) and 254 (226-282) minutes in Group A, 226 (209-243) and 220 (200-240) minutes in Group B and 270 (249-291) and 264 (244-284) minutes in Group C. Duration of sensory and motor block duration differed significantly between groups (p = 0.012 and p = 0.016 respectively). Post-hoc analysis showed a significantly reduced sensory and motor block duration in Group B when compared to Group C of 44 min. No local anesthetic systemic toxicity was reported. CONCLUSIONS: When using mepivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block, a higher dose and concentration was associated with a longer duration of sensory and motor blockade, but not a higher volume. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR3648 . Registered October 3, 2012.
背景:容量、浓度和剂量以何种方式影响阻滞持续时间存在争议。本研究的目的是探讨甲哌卡因的剂量、容量和浓度对超声引导下单次腋路臂丛神经阻滞感觉和运动阻滞持续时间的影响。 方法:在奈梅亨圣马丁诊所进行的这项平行组随机试验中,45例接受小型骨科前臂、手腕或手部手术的成年患者被随机分为3组。A组:20毫升1.5%甲哌卡因;B组:30毫升1%甲哌卡因;C组:30毫升1.5%甲哌卡因。随机分组由计算机生成,通过不透明的顺序编号密封信封进行分配隐藏。患者和观察者对分组情况不知情。 主要观察指标:感觉阻滞持续时间。 结果:45例患者被随机分组,4例患者被排除并替换,每组15例患者纳入分析。A组感觉和运动阻滞的平均(95%CI)持续时间分别为256(230 - 282)分钟和254(226 - 282)分钟;B组为226(209 - 243)分钟和220(200 - 240)分钟;C组为270(249 - 291)分钟和264(244 - 284)分钟。感觉和运动阻滞持续时间在组间差异有统计学意义(分别为p = 0.012和p = 0.016)。事后分析显示,与C组相比,B组感觉和运动阻滞持续时间显著缩短44分钟。未报告局部麻醉药全身毒性。 结论:当使用甲哌卡因进行腋路臂丛神经阻滞时,较高的剂量和浓度与较长的感觉和运动阻滞持续时间相关,但容量并非如此。 试验注册:荷兰国家试验注册库NTR3648。2012年10月3日注册。
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2006-11
Ann Transl Med. 2023-12-20
Anaesthesist. 2022-4
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014-8
Br J Anaesth. 2009-12-23