von Gunten A, Ebbing K, Imhof A, Giannakopoulos P, Kövari E
Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie de l'Age Avancé (SUPAA), Department of Psychiatry of CHUV, University of Lausanne, Route du Mont, 1008 Prilly, Switzerland.
Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2010;2010. doi: 10.1155/2010/358531. Epub 2010 Jul 25.
Nonagenarians and centenarians represent a quickly growing age group worldwide. In parallel, the prevalence of dementia increases substantially, but how to define dementia in this oldest-old age segment remains unclear. Although the idea that the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) decreases after age 90 has now been questioned, the oldest-old still represent a population relatively resistant to degenerative brain processes. Brain aging is characterised by the formation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) and senile plaques (SPs) as well as neuronal and synaptic loss in both cognitively intact individuals and patients with AD. In nondemented cases NFTs are usually restricted to the hippocampal formation, whereas the progressive involvement of the association areas in the temporal neocortex parallels the development of overt clinical signs of dementia. In contrast, there is little correlation between the quantitative distribution of SP and AD severity. The pattern of lesion distribution and neuronal loss changes in extreme aging relative to the younger-old. In contrast to younger cases where dementia is mainly related to severe NFT formation within adjacent components of the medial and inferior aspects of the temporal cortex, oldest-old individuals display a preferential involvement of the anterior part of the CA1 field of the hippocampus whereas the inferior temporal and frontal association areas are relatively spared. This pattern suggests that both the extent of NFT development in the hippocampus as well as a displacement of subregional NFT distribution within the Cornu ammonis (CA) fields may be key determinants of dementia in the very old. Cortical association areas are relatively preserved. The progression of NFT formation across increasing cognitive impairment was significantly slower in nonagenarians and centenarians compared to younger cases in the CA1 field and entorhinal cortex. The total amount of amyloid and the neuronal loss in these regions were also significantly lower than those reported in younger AD cases. Overall, there is evidence that pathological substrates of cognitive deterioration in the oldest-old are different from those observed in the younger-old. Microvascular parameters such as mean capillary diameters may be key factors to consider for the prediction of cognitive decline in the oldest-old. Neuropathological particularities of the oldest-old may be related to "longevity-enabling" genes although little or nothing is known in this promising field of future research.
在全球范围内,九十多岁老人和百岁老人是一个快速增长的年龄群体。与此同时,痴呆症的患病率大幅上升,但如何在这个最年长的年龄组中定义痴呆症仍不清楚。尽管现在有人质疑90岁以后患阿尔茨海默病(AD)的风险会降低这一观点,但最年长的老人仍然是相对抵抗退行性脑过程的人群。脑老化的特征是在认知功能正常的个体和AD患者中均出现神经原纤维缠结(NFTs)和老年斑(SPs)的形成以及神经元和突触的丧失。在非痴呆病例中,NFTs通常局限于海马结构,而颞叶新皮质联合区的逐渐受累与痴呆症明显临床症状的发展平行。相比之下,SP的定量分布与AD严重程度之间几乎没有相关性。相对于年轻老人,极端衰老时病变分布和神经元丧失的模式会发生变化。与年轻病例不同,在年轻病例中痴呆症主要与颞叶皮质内侧和下方相邻区域内严重的NFT形成有关,而最年长的个体海马CA1区前部优先受累,而颞下回和额叶联合区相对未受影响。这种模式表明,海马中NFT发展的程度以及海马(CA)区亚区域NFT分布的移位可能是非常年老人群中痴呆症的关键决定因素。皮质联合区相对保留。与年轻病例相比,在CA1区和内嗅皮质中,九十多岁老人和百岁老人中随着认知障碍加重NFT形成的进展明显较慢。这些区域中淀粉样蛋白的总量和神经元丧失也明显低于年轻AD病例中的报道。总体而言,有证据表明最年长老人认知衰退的病理基础与年轻老人中观察到的不同。微血管参数如平均毛细血管直径可能是预测最年长老人认知衰退时需要考虑的关键因素。最年长老人的神经病理学特殊性可能与“长寿基因”有关,尽管在这个未来研究的有前景领域中所知甚少或几乎一无所知。