McLeod Carolyn
Hypatia. 2010 Winter;25(1):11-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01082.x.
This paper addresses the likely impact on women of being denied emergency contraception (EC) by pharmacists who conscientiously refuse to provide it. A common view-defended by Elizabeth Fenton and Loren Lomasky, among others-is that these refusals inconvenience rather than harm women so long as the women can easily get EC somewhere else close by. I argue from a feminist perspective that the refusals harm women even when they can easily get EC somewhere else close by.
本文探讨了药剂师出于良心拒提供紧急避孕药（EC）可能对女性产生的影响。一种常见观点（伊丽莎白·芬顿和洛伦·洛马斯基等人支持这一观点）认为，只要女性能够在附近轻松获得紧急避孕药，这些拒提供行为给女性带来的是不便而非伤害。我从女权主义视角出发认为，即便女性能够在附近轻松获得紧急避孕药，这些拒提供行为仍会对女性造成伤害。
