Suppr超能文献

乳腺磁共振成像作为乳腺X线摄影的辅助手段:它真的存在特异性低的问题吗?一项按乳腺X线摄影BI-RADS分类分层的回顾性分析。

Breast MRI as an adjunct to mammography: Does it really suffer from low specificity? A retrospective analysis stratified by mammographic BI-RADS classes.

作者信息

Benndorf Matthias, Baltzer Pascal A T, Vag Tibor, Gajda Mieczyslaw, Runnebaum Ingo B, Kaiser Werner A

机构信息

Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Radiol. 2010 Sep;51(7):715-21. doi: 10.3109/02841851.2010.497164.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reports on the specificity of breast MRI are heterogeneous, depending on the respective setting of the performed study.

PURPOSE

To retrospectively estimate the sensitivity and especially the specificity of breast MRI in the non-screening setting as an adjunct to mammography sorted by breast density and to estimate the accuracy of breast MRI in cases rated BI-RADS 0 and 3 mammographically.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 216 consecutive patients with referral to breast MRI and previously acquired mammography were enrolled in this analysis. Negative findings were followed up with a mean time of 26.7 months. The loss to follow-up was 10.8%. The single breast was regarded as the study subject (n=399, 364 cases were eligible for calculation of diagnostic accuracy). BI-RADS 1 and 2 were rated as benign, 4 and 5 as malignant. BI-RADS 0 and 3 were analyzed separately. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated from the normally approximated binomial distribution and taken to represent significant differences for the two imaging modalities if they did not overlap.

RESULTS

Among the study population, 62 malignant neoplasms were detected. For cases rated BI-RADS 1, 2, 4, and 5 (n=251), the sensitivity of breast MRI was 95.7% (95% CI 89.9-100.0%) and 74.5% (95% CI 62.0-87.0%) for mammography, respectively. The specificity of breast MRI was 96.1% (95% CI 93.4-98.8%) and 92.2% (95% CI 88.5-95.9%) for mammography, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI did not depend on breast density. In cases rated BI-RADS 0, n=57 (3, n=56), breast MRI achieved a sensitivity of 100% (90.9%) and a specificity of 98.1% (88.9%). There was a significant (P< 0.01) accumulation of dense breast tissue (ACR IV) in breasts rated BI-RADS 0 in mammography. Breast MRI missed three malignant lesions, two of them being smaller than 3 mm.

CONCLUSION

There is no rationale to criticize the low specificity of breast MRI when used as an adjunct to mammography. The independency of the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI from breast density makes it a worthwhile choice in mammographic BI-RADS 0 cases.

摘要

背景

关于乳腺MRI特异性的报道存在异质性,这取决于所开展研究的具体情况。

目的

回顾性评估乳腺MRI在非筛查情况下作为乳腺X线摄影辅助检查的敏感性,尤其是特异性,并按乳腺密度进行分类,同时评估乳腺X线摄影BI-RADS 0级和3级病例中乳腺MRI的准确性。

材料与方法

本分析共纳入216例连续转诊至乳腺MRI检查且此前已进行乳腺X线摄影的患者。对阴性结果进行了平均26.7个月的随访。失访率为10.8%。将单乳视为研究对象(n = 399,364例符合诊断准确性计算条件)。BI-RADS 1级和2级判定为良性,4级和5级判定为恶性。BI-RADS 0级和3级分别进行分析。95%置信区间(CIs)根据正态近似二项分布计算,若二者不重叠,则代表两种成像方式存在显著差异。

结果

在研究人群中,共检测到62例恶性肿瘤。对于BI-RADS 1级、2级、4级和5级病例(n = 251),乳腺MRI的敏感性为95.7%(95%CI 89.9 - 100.0%),乳腺X线摄影的敏感性为74.5%(95%CI 62.0 - 87.0%)。乳腺MRI的特异性分别为96.1%(95%CI 93.4 - 98.8%)和乳腺X线摄影的特异性为92.2%(95%CI 88.5 - 95.9%)。乳腺MRI的诊断准确性不依赖于乳腺密度。在BI-RADS 0级病例中(n = 57,3例,n = 56),乳腺MRI的敏感性为100%(90.9%),特异性为98.1%(88.9%)。在乳腺X线摄影中,BI-RADS 0级乳腺中致密乳腺组织(ACR IV)有显著(P < 0.01)积聚。乳腺MRI漏诊了3个恶性病变,其中2个小于3 mm。

结论

当乳腺MRI作为乳腺X线摄影的辅助检查时,没有理由批评其低特异性。乳腺MRI诊断准确性不依赖于乳腺密度,这使其在乳腺X线摄影BI-RADS 0级病例中成为一个值得选择的检查方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验