Suppr超能文献

调强适形盆腔放疗治疗宫颈癌的临床结果。

Clinical outcomes of intensity-modulated pelvic radiation therapy for carcinoma of the cervix.

机构信息

Departments of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Aug 1;80(5):1436-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.04.041. Epub 2010 Aug 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate disease outcomes and toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We included all patients with Stage I-IVA cervical carcinoma treated with IMRT at three different institutions from 2000-2007. Patients treated with extended field or conventional techniques were excluded. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans were designed to deliver 45 Gy in 1.8-Gy daily fractions to the planning target volume while minimizing dose to the bowel, bladder, and rectum. Toxicity was graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group system. Overall survival and disease-free survival were estimated by use of the Kaplan-Meier method. Pelvic failure, distant failure, and late toxicity were estimated by use of cumulative incidence functions.

RESULTS

The study included 111 patients. Of these, 22 were treated with postoperative IMRT, 8 with IMRT followed by intracavitary brachytherapy and adjuvant hysterectomy, and 81 with IMRT followed by planned intracavitary brachytherapy. Of the patients, 63 had Stage I-IIA disease and 48 had Stage IIB-IVA disease. The median follow-up time was 27 months. The 3-year overall survival rate and the disease-free survival rate were 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68-88%) and 69% (95% CI, 59-81%), respectively. The 3-year pelvic failure rate and the distant failure rate were 14% (95% CI, 6-22%) and 17% (95% CI, 8-25%), respectively. Estimates of acute and late Grade 3 toxicity or higher were 2% (95% CI, 0-7%) and 7% (95% CI, 2-13%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy is associated with low toxicity and favorable outcomes, supporting its safety and efficacy for cervical cancer. Prospective clinical trials are needed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of IMRT vs. conventional techniques.

摘要

目的

评估采用盆腔调强放疗(IMRT)治疗宫颈癌患者的疾病转归和毒性。

方法和材料

我们纳入了 2000 年至 2007 年间在三个不同机构接受 IMRT 治疗的所有 I-IVA 期宫颈癌患者。排除了接受扩展野或常规技术治疗的患者。调强放疗计划旨在将 45 Gy 以 1.8 Gy 的每日分次剂量传递至计划靶区,同时将肠道、膀胱和直肠的剂量降至最低。毒性根据放射治疗肿瘤学组(Radiation Therapy Oncology Group)系统进行分级。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计总生存率和无病生存率。使用累积发生率函数估计盆腔失败、远处失败和晚期毒性。

结果

研究纳入了 111 例患者。其中,22 例接受术后 IMRT 治疗,8 例接受 IMRT 后腔内近距离放疗和辅助子宫切除术治疗,81 例接受 IMRT 后计划腔内近距离放疗治疗。患者中,63 例为 I-IIA 期疾病,48 例为 IIB-IVA 期疾病。中位随访时间为 27 个月。3 年总生存率和无病生存率分别为 78%(95%置信区间[CI],68-88%)和 69%(95% CI,59-81%)。3 年盆腔失败率和远处失败率分别为 14%(95% CI,6-22%)和 17%(95% CI,8-25%)。急性和晚期 3 级及以上毒性的估计值分别为 2%(95% CI,0-7%)和 7%(95% CI,2-13%)。

结论

调强放疗具有低毒性和良好的转归,支持其用于宫颈癌的安全性和有效性。需要前瞻性临床试验来评估 IMRT 与常规技术的比较疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验