Research Unit Molecular Diagnostics, Center for Applied Biomedicine, Medical University of Graz, Universitaetsplatz 4, 8010 Graz, Austria.
J Clin Virol. 2010 Oct;49(2):82-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2010.07.012. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
Detection and differentiation of influenza A viral RNA and influenza A (H1N1) 2009 viral RNA have gained significance because of their widespread community transmission.
To study the accuracy and the performance of four molecular assays for the detection and differentiation of influenza A viral RNA and influenza A (H1N1) 2009 viral RNA in the routine diagnostic laboratory.
The accuracy of the molecular assays was determined with reference material. For evaluation of the performance, 104 clinical specimens were studied. Sample preparation was done on a fully automated extraction instrument. For amplification and detection of influenza RNA, all molecular assays evaluated were based on real-time PCR.
When the accuracy was tested, the majority of assays yielded results as expected. When clinical samples were analyzed, 94 samples gave concordant results with all assays. One of the assays showed one false-negative result and another assay 10 false-negatives.
The majority of assays evaluated in this study proved suitable for the detection and differentiation of influenza A viral RNA and influenza A (H1N1) 2009 viral RNA. All assays are easy to handle and provide results rapidly.
由于流感 A 病毒 RNA 和 2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感病毒 RNA 的广泛社区传播,对其进行检测和区分变得尤为重要。
研究四种分子检测方法在常规诊断实验室中检测和区分流感 A 病毒 RNA 和 2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感病毒 RNA 的准确性和性能。
通过参考材料确定分子检测方法的准确性。为了评估性能,研究了 104 份临床标本。样品制备在全自动提取仪器上进行。所有评估的分子检测方法均基于实时 PCR 进行流感 RNA 的扩增和检测。
当测试准确性时,大多数检测方法均得出预期结果。分析临床样本时,所有检测方法均得出 94 个一致结果。其中一种检测方法出现 1 个假阴性结果,另一种检测方法出现 10 个假阴性结果。
本研究评估的大多数检测方法均适合检测和区分流感 A 病毒 RNA 和 2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感病毒 RNA。所有检测方法易于操作,可快速提供结果。