Suppr超能文献

另一种观点:少即是多:追求完美有何不妥?

An alternative point of view: getting by with less: what's wrong with perfection?

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2247-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f17c28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Predictions about the future impact of technologic and process innovations inspire optimistic visions. Optimism and speculation require a counterweight. Because results often do not turn out as expected, anticipating failure is useful, and anticipating unintended consequences is visionary.

MEASUREMENTS

A history of unfulfilled prognostications was explored with the intent of finding something essential to the complexities of medicine. Do missed predictions signal another side to innovation that also helps us uncover new information about our world?

MAIN RESULTS

Serendipity is an important theme in medical innovation. There is no reason to think this will change. Things do not necessarily go as planned, but often the results are as important as the original prediction was supposed to be. It will not be clear where we end up until we get there.

CONCLUSIONS

Ideal goals are useful but speculative and subjective. There in fact might be several ideals and contingency is important. The detours and incidental stops on the way to an ideal are more fruitful than the goal itself.

摘要

目的

对技术和流程创新未来影响的预测激发了人们乐观的愿景。乐观和猜测需要一个制衡因素。因为结果往往不如预期,所以预测失败是有用的,而预测意外后果则具有远见。

措施

本研究旨在通过探索未实现的预测记录,找到与医学复杂性相关的基本要素。错过的预测是否标志着创新的另一面,也有助于我们发现有关我们世界的新信息?

主要结果

偶然发现是医学创新的一个重要主题。没有理由认为这种情况会改变。事情并不一定会按计划进行,但通常结果与最初的预测同样重要。直到我们到达目的地,才会清楚我们的最终位置。

结论

理想的目标是有用的,但具有推测性和主观性。实际上可能存在多种理想,偶然性很重要。通往理想的迂回曲折和偶然停留比目标本身更有成果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验