• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强直性脊柱炎的放射学评分方法:现有方法可靠性的比较

Radiological scoring methods in ankylosing spondylitis: a comparison of the reliability of available methods.

作者信息

Ulusoy Hasan, Kaya Arzu, Kamanli Ayhan, Akgol Gurkan, Ozgocmen Salih

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Firat University, Faculty of Medicine, Elazig, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Reumatol Port. 2010 Apr-Jun;35(2):170-5.

PMID:20711092
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess intra and inter-rater reliability of available radiological scoring methods in ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two trained raters evaluated 44 complete sets of AS radiographs. The cervical and lumbar spine was graded from zero to 4 according to the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index (BASRI). Hip joints were graded according to the BASRI-hip method. Sacroiliac (SI) joints were scored according to the New York method (0-4). The anterior and posterior sites of the lumbar spine were scored according to the Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (SASSS) method (0-72). Modified-SASSS was assessed by using the anterior sites of both the cervical and lumbar spine (0-72).

RESULTS

Both intra and inter-rater reliability were almost perfect for all the methods and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for all the methods was relatively similar to each other. The BASRI-spine and BASRI-total showed intra and inter-rater ICC between 0.78 and 0.98. Both SASSS and modified--SASSS reached perfect intra and inter-rater reliability with ICC between 0.86 and 0.99. The ICC of the BASRI-hip was substantial to perfect, ranging from 0.77 to 0.88. Time spent to score a set of radiographs using the BASRI-spine was <45 seconds, whereas >60 seconds for both SASSS and mSASSS methods.

CONCLUSION

After training, all of these methods have demonstrated almost perfect intra and inter-rater reliability. The BASRI was easier to perform and less time consuming than SASSS methods.

摘要

目的

评估强直性脊柱炎(AS)现有放射学评分方法的评分者内和评分者间信度。

患者与方法

两名经过培训的评分者对44套完整的AS X光片进行评估。根据巴斯强直性脊柱炎放射学指数(BASRI),颈椎和腰椎从零到4级进行分级。髋关节根据BASRI-髋关节方法进行分级。骶髂(SI)关节根据纽约方法进行评分(0-4级)。腰椎的前后部位根据斯托克强直性脊柱炎脊柱评分(SASSS)方法进行评分(0-72分)。改良SASSS通过使用颈椎和腰椎的前部进行评估(0-72分)。

结果

所有方法的评分者内和评分者间信度几乎都很高,所有方法的组内相关系数(ICC)彼此相对相似。BASRI-脊柱和BASRI-总分的评分者内和评分者间ICC在0.78至0.98之间。SASSS和改良SASSS均达到了完美的评分者内和评分者间信度,ICC在0.86至0.99之间。BASRI-髋关节的ICC从高到完美,范围为0.77至0.88。使用BASRI-脊柱对一组X光片进行评分的时间<45秒,而SASSS和mSASSS方法均>60秒。

结论

经过培训后,所有这些方法都显示出几乎完美的评分者内和评分者间信度。BASRI比SASSS方法更易于操作且耗时更少。

相似文献

1
Radiological scoring methods in ankylosing spondylitis: a comparison of the reliability of available methods.强直性脊柱炎的放射学评分方法:现有方法可靠性的比较
Acta Reumatol Port. 2010 Apr-Jun;35(2):170-5.
2
Radiological scoring methods in ankylosing spondylitis. Reliability and change over 1 and 2 years.强直性脊柱炎的放射学评分方法。1年和2年期间的可靠性及变化情况。
J Rheumatol. 2004 Jan;31(1):125-32.
3
Radiological scoring methods for ankylosing spondylitis: a comparison between the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index and the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score.强直性脊柱炎的放射学评分方法:巴斯强直性脊柱炎放射学指数与改良斯托克强直性脊柱炎脊柱评分的比较
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 Jan-Feb;25(1):67-74.
4
Radiological scoring methods in ankylosing spondylitis: reliability and sensitivity to change over one year.强直性脊柱炎的放射学评分方法:一年期间的可靠性及对变化的敏感性
J Rheumatol. 1999 Apr;26(4):997-1002.
5
Comparison of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index and the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score in Turkish patients with ankylosing spondylitis.比较 Bath 强直性脊柱炎放射学指数和改良 Stoke 强直性脊柱炎脊柱评分在土耳其强直性脊柱炎患者中的应用。
Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Jan;29(1):65-70. doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1290-0. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
6
What is the most appropriate radiologic scoring method for ankylosing spondylitis? A comparison of the available methods based on the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials filter.强直性脊柱炎最适宜的放射学评分方法是什么?基于风湿病临床试验疗效指标筛选的现有方法比较。
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Aug;50(8):2622-32. doi: 10.1002/art.20446.
7
Comparison of radiological indices (SASSS, M-SASSS, BASRI-s, BASRI-t) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.比较强直性脊柱炎患者的影像学指标(ASASSS、mSASSS、BASRI-s、BASRI-t)。
Rheumatol Int. 2012 Jul;32(7):2069-74. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-1935-6. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
8
A new dimension to outcome: application of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index.结果的新维度:巴斯强直性脊柱炎放射学指数的应用。
J Rheumatol. 1999 Apr;26(4):988-92.
9
The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index (BASRI): a new, validated approach to disease assessment.巴斯强直性脊柱炎放射学指数(BASRI):一种经过验证的新型疾病评估方法。
Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Dec;41(12):2263-70. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199812)41:12<2263::AID-ART23>3.0.CO;2-I.
10
Reliability of radiographic scoring methods in axial psoriatic arthritis.轴向银屑病关节炎的放射学评分方法的可靠性。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Sep;66(9):1417-22. doi: 10.1002/acr.22308.

引用本文的文献

1
Harmonization, data management, and statistical issues related to prospective multicenter studies in Ankylosing spondylitis (AS): Experience from the Prospective Study Of Ankylosing Spondylitis (PSOAS) cohort.强直性脊柱炎(AS)前瞻性多中心研究中的协调、数据管理及统计学问题:来自强直性脊柱炎前瞻性研究(PSOAS)队列的经验
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Jul 25;11:127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.07.004. eCollection 2018 Sep.
2
Better Quantification of Syndesmophyte Growth in Axial Spondyloarthritis.更好地定量评估强直性脊柱炎的骨桥形成。
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2018 Jun 21;20(8):46. doi: 10.1007/s11926-018-0759-8.