Suppr超能文献

强直性脊柱炎的放射学评分方法:巴斯强直性脊柱炎放射学指数与改良斯托克强直性脊柱炎脊柱评分的比较

Radiological scoring methods for ankylosing spondylitis: a comparison between the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index and the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score.

作者信息

Salaffi F, Carotti M, Garofalo G, Giuseppetti G M, Grassi W

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 Jan-Feb;25(1):67-74.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of the present study was to test the interobserver reliability, truth, discrimination and feasibility of two scoring methods available in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) over a follow-up period of 3 years.

METHODS

Two blinded trained observers scored 95 AS radiographs from a cohort of AS patients. Each radiograph was scored by two scoring methods, the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS), and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index--spine (BASRI-spine). Interobserver agreement was analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). The construct validity was assessed by examining the correlation of the scoring methods with measures of spinal mobility (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metronomy Index--BASMI), functional limitation (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index--BASFI) and disease duration. Bland and Altman's 95% limits of agreement method and effect size (ES) analysis were used to estimate the smallest detectable difference (SDD) of radiological progression and responsiveness.

RESULTS

The BASRI-spine reached intra- and interobserver ICC of 0.755 and 0.831, respectively. The mSASSS scores were more reliable, with ICC of 0.874 and 0.941, respectively. Both scoring systems correlated significantly with BASMI (p = 0.01), while only the mSASSS showed a significant correlation (p = 0.02) with BASFI. With regards to sensitivity to change, it was found that mSASSS classified the highest percentage of patients with more changes than the BASRI-spine (mSASSS: 35.8% vs. BASRI-spine: 15.8%). The ES analysis also suggested that the mSASSS was more responsive than BASRI-spine. Concerning feasibility, the BASRI-spine takes less time for scoring.

CONCLUSION

We have shown that the mSASSS offers advantages in measurement properties and is the most appropriate method by which to assess progression of structural damage in AS.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是在3年的随访期内,测试强直性脊柱炎(AS)中两种可用评分方法的观察者间信度、真实性、辨别力和可行性。

方法

两名经过盲法培训的观察者对一组AS患者的95张X线片进行评分。每张X线片采用两种评分方法进行评分,即改良斯托克强直性脊柱炎脊柱评分(mSASSS)和巴斯强直性脊柱炎放射学指数-脊柱(BASRI-脊柱)。通过组内相关系数(ICC)分析观察者间的一致性。通过检查评分方法与脊柱活动度测量指标(巴斯强直性脊柱炎节拍指数-BASMI)、功能受限指标(巴斯强直性脊柱炎功能指数-BASFI)和病程之间的相关性来评估结构效度。采用布兰德和奥特曼的95%一致性界限法和效应量(ES)分析来估计放射学进展和反应性的最小可检测差异(SDD)。

结果

BASRI-脊柱的观察者内和观察者间ICC分别为0.755和0.831。mSASSS评分更可靠,ICC分别为0.874和0.941。两种评分系统均与BASMI显著相关(p = 0.01),而只有mSASSS与BASFI显著相关(p = 0.02)。关于对变化的敏感性,发现mSASSS对变化大于BASRI-脊柱的患者分类百分比最高(mSASSS:35.8%对BASRI-脊柱:15.8%)。ES分析也表明mSASSS比BASRI-脊柱更具反应性。关于可行性,BASRI-脊柱评分所需时间更少。

结论

我们已经表明,mSASSS在测量特性方面具有优势,是评估AS结构损伤进展的最合适方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验