Health Promotion Research Center, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Sep;7(5):A110. Epub 2010 Aug 15.
Analysis of outcome measures from nonrandomized, observational studies of people participating or not participating in health programs may be suspect because of selection bias. For example, fitness programs may preferentially enroll people who are already committed to healthy lifestyles, including use of preventive services. Some of our earlier studies have attempted to account for this potential bias by including an ad hoc preventive services index created from the patient's number of earlier clinical preventive services, to adjust for health-seeking behaviors. However, this index has not been validated. We formally evaluated the performance of this preventive services index by comparing it with its component parts and with an alternative index derived from principal component analysis by using the weighted sums of the principal components.
We used data from a cohort of 38,046 older adults. We used the following variables from the administrative database of a health maintenance organization to create this index: fecal occult blood test, flexible sigmoidoscopy, screening mammogram, prostate cancer screening, influenza vaccination, pneumococcal vaccination, and preventive care office visits.
The preventive services index was positively correlated with each of the following components: colon cancer screening (r = .752), screening mammogram (r = .559), prostate cancer screening (r = .592), influenza vaccination (r = .844), pneumococcal vaccination (r = .487), and preventive care office visits (r = .737). An alternative preventive services index, created by using principal component analysis, had similar performance.
A preventive services index created by using administrative data has good face validity and construct validity and can be used to partially adjust for selection bias in observational studies of cost and use outcomes.
对参与或不参与健康计划的人群进行非随机、观察性研究,其结果衡量指标的分析可能存在选择偏差,因此值得怀疑。例如,健身计划可能会优先招收那些已经致力于健康生活方式的人,包括使用预防服务。我们之前的一些研究试图通过创建一个由患者之前的临床预防服务次数组成的临时预防服务指数来调整健康寻求行为,从而弥补这种潜在的偏差。然而,该指数尚未得到验证。我们通过将其与组成部分以及使用主成分分析得出的替代指数进行比较,正式评估了该预防服务指数的性能,方法是使用加权总和的主成分。
我们使用了一个由 38046 名老年人组成的队列的数据。我们使用健康维护组织的管理数据库中的以下变量来创建该指数:粪便潜血试验、乙状结肠镜检查、筛查性乳房 X 光检查、前列腺癌筛查、流感疫苗接种、肺炎球菌疫苗接种和预防保健就诊。
预防服务指数与以下各项呈正相关:结肠癌筛查(r =.752)、筛查性乳房 X 光检查(r =.559)、前列腺癌筛查(r =.592)、流感疫苗接种(r =.844)、肺炎球菌疫苗接种(r =.487)和预防保健就诊(r =.737)。使用主成分分析创建的替代预防服务指数具有相似的性能。
使用管理数据创建的预防服务指数具有良好的表面有效性和结构有效性,可用于部分调整观察性研究中关于成本和使用结果的选择偏差。