• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

子宫修复方法对剖宫产手术结局的影响。

Effects of method of uterine repair on surgical outcome of cesarean delivery.

机构信息

Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Research and Education Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Nov;111(2):175-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.06.009
PMID:20713293
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications of uterine repair when performed in situ or extra-abdominally following cesarean delivery.

METHODS

In this prospective randomized study 4925 women who underwent cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to in situ (n = 2462) or extra-abdominal (n = 2463) uterine repair (group 1 and group 2, respectively). The study compares drop in hemoglobin concentration (as a measure of intraoperative blood loss). It also compares operating time, time to return of bowel sound, and duration of hospitalization as well as rates of uterine atony, blood transfusion, intraoperative complications, additional use postoperative analgesics, endometritis, and wound infection.

RESULTS

Uterine atony developed in 96 women (3.8%) in group 1 and 226 women (9.1%) in group 2 (P = 0.001). Moreover, the operating time and the time to return of bowel sound were shorter and the rates of both additional use of postoperative analgesics and wound infection were lower in group 1 (P = 0.001, P = 0.002, P = 0.001, and P = 0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Fewer cases of uterine atony, a shorter operating time, a faster return of bowel function, a lesser need for postoperative analgesics, and lower rates of additional use of postoperative analgesics and wound infections suggest that in-situ uterine repair ought to be preferred to extra-abdominal uterine repair following cesarean delivery.

摘要

目的

比较剖宫产术后原位与腹部外修补子宫时术中及术后并发症的发生率。

方法

在这项前瞻性随机研究中,4925 名接受剖宫产术的妇女被随机分配至原位(n = 2462)或腹部外(n = 2463)子宫修复(分别为组 1 和组 2)。本研究比较了血红蛋白浓度下降(作为术中失血量的衡量标准)。它还比较了手术时间、肠鸣音恢复时间和住院时间,以及子宫收缩乏力、输血、术中并发症、术后额外使用止痛药、子宫内膜炎和伤口感染的发生率。

结果

组 1 中有 96 名妇女(3.8%)发生子宫收缩乏力,组 2 中有 226 名妇女(9.1%)发生子宫收缩乏力(P = 0.001)。此外,组 1 的手术时间和肠鸣音恢复时间更短,术后额外使用止痛药和伤口感染的发生率也更低(P = 0.001,P = 0.002,P = 0.001 和 P = 0.003)。

结论

子宫收缩乏力的发生率较低,手术时间较短,肠蠕动恢复较快,术后止痛药的需求较少,术后额外使用止痛药和伤口感染的发生率较低,提示剖宫产术后原位子宫修复应优于腹部外子宫修复。

相似文献

1
Effects of method of uterine repair on surgical outcome of cesarean delivery.子宫修复方法对剖宫产手术结局的影响。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Nov;111(2):175-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
2
Comparison of uterine exteriorization and in situ repair during cesarean sections.剖宫产术中子宫外置与原位修复的比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Jun;285(6):1541-5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2186-1. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
3
Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.剖宫产术中子宫外置与原位修复的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):639-47. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816521e2.
4
Complications of exteriorized compared with in situ uterine repair at cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.脊髓麻醉下剖宫产术中子宫外置修复与原位修复的并发症:一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;110(3):570-5. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000277712.67230.22.
5
A randomized controlled trial of uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair of the uterine incision during cesarean delivery.剖宫产术中子宫外置与子宫切口原位修复的随机对照试验。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Nov;127(2):163-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
6
The effect of placental removal method and site of uterine repair on postcesarean endometritis and operative blood loss.胎盘娩出方法及子宫修复部位对剖宫产术后子宫内膜炎及手术失血的影响。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Mar;84(3):266-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00729.x.
7
Influence of uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair on post-Cesarean maternal pain: a randomized trial.子宫外置与原位修复对剖宫产术后产妇疼痛的影响:一项随机试验。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007 Apr;16(2):135-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.10.009. Epub 2007 Feb 5.
8
Infectious morbidity, operative blood loss, and length of the operative procedure after cesarean delivery by method of placental removal and site of uterine repair.剖宫产术后通过胎盘娩出方法及子宫修复部位的感染发病率、术中失血量及手术时长。
J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Dec;181(6):517-20.
9
Extra-abdominal removal of placenta during cesarean section: a prospective randomized controlled trial of a novel technique.剖宫产术中胎盘腹腔外取出:一项新技术的前瞻性随机对照试验
J Perinat Med. 2016 Jul 1;44(5):557-65. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2015-0330.
10
A randomised controlled trial of uterine exteriorisation and non-exteriorisation at caesarean section.剖宫产术中子宫外置与非外置的随机对照试验。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Dec;48(6):570-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00902.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair in Cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.子宫外置与原位修复在剖宫产术中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Can J Anaesth. 2022 Feb;69(2):216-233. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02142-8. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
2
The Health Impact of Surgical Techniques and Assistive Methods Used in Cesarean Deliveries: A Systemic Review.剖宫产术中手术技术和辅助方法的健康影响:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 21;17(18):6894. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186894.
3
Uterine exteriorization versus intraperitoneal repair: effect on intraoperative nausea and vomiting during repeat cesarean delivery - A randomized clinical trial.
子宫外置术与腹腔内修复术:对再次剖宫产术中恶心呕吐的影响——一项随机临床试验
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018 Sep;10(3):131-137.
4
Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section.剖宫产时子宫切口及子宫缝合的手术技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 22;2014(7):CD004732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004732.pub3.