Suppr超能文献

剖宫产术后通过胎盘娩出方法及子宫修复部位的感染发病率、术中失血量及手术时长。

Infectious morbidity, operative blood loss, and length of the operative procedure after cesarean delivery by method of placental removal and site of uterine repair.

作者信息

Magann E F, Washburne J F, Harris R L, Bass J D, Duff W P, Morrison J C

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson 39216-4505, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Dec;181(6):517-20.

PMID:7582225
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was done to determine the impact of the method of placental removal and the site of uterine repair on postcesarean infectious morbidity rates in women receiving prophylactic antibiotics at cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective study included 284 women who underwent cesarean delivery and who were randomly assigned to four groups based on the method of placental removal and the site of uterine repair: group 1, spontaneous placental removal and in situ uterine repair; group 2, spontaneous placental removal and exteriorized uterine repair; group 3, manual placental removal and in situ uterine repair; and group 4, manual placental removal with exteriorized uterine repair. Exclusion criteria were repeat cesarean deliveries without labor, active infection at the time of cesarean delivery, and patient refusal to participate.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference among the groups in maternal age, race, parity, weight, the length of time from rupture of membranes (ROM) or the number of vaginal examinations from ROM to cesarean delivery, or preoperative hematocrit. Intraoperatively, the type of uterine incision, anesthesia administered, incidence of meconium-stained amniotic fluid, Apgar scores, and cord gases were similar between groups. The incidence of postcesarean endometritis was greater in group 4 (32 [45 percent] of 71, p = 0.003) compared with group 1 (17 [24 percent] of 71), group 2 (12 [30 percent] of 71); and group 3 (13 [18 percent] of 71).

CONCLUSIONS

Manual placental removal and exteriorization of the uterus for repair of the surgical incision increases the infectious morbidity rate in women receiving prophylactic antibiotics at the time of cesarean delivery and increases the length of hospitalization.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定剖宫产时胎盘娩出方式及子宫修复部位对接受预防性抗生素治疗的剖宫产妇女术后感染发病率的影响。

研究设计

这项前瞻性研究纳入了284例行剖宫产的妇女,她们根据胎盘娩出方式及子宫修复部位被随机分为四组:第1组,胎盘自然娩出及子宫原位修复;第2组,胎盘自然娩出及子宫外置修复;第3组,人工剥离胎盘及子宫原位修复;第4组,人工剥离胎盘及子宫外置修复。排除标准为无临产史的再次剖宫产、剖宫产时存在活动性感染以及患者拒绝参与。

结果

各组在产妇年龄、种族、产次、体重、胎膜破裂至剖宫产的时间长度、胎膜破裂至剖宫产期间的阴道检查次数或术前血细胞比容方面无显著差异。术中,各组间子宫切口类型、麻醉方式、羊水粪染发生率、阿氏评分及脐血血气指标相似。与第1组(71例中的17例[24%])、第2组(71例中的12例[30%])和第3组(71例中的13例[18%])相比,第4组剖宫产术后子宫内膜炎的发生率更高(71例中的32例[45%],p = 0.003)。

结论

剖宫产时人工剥离胎盘及子宫外置修复手术切口会增加接受预防性抗生素治疗的妇女的感染发病率,并延长住院时间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验