Balter M B, Uhlenhuth E H
Department of Psychiatry, Tufts University, School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1991 Jul;52 Suppl:16-23.
Findings from a four-city study of the beneficial and adverse effects of hypnotics are reported. The study employed a new volunteer call-in method for monitoring drug effects outside of the clinical setting. Respondents were recruited through newspaper advertisements. They were invited to complete a short telephone interview if, during the past 12 months, they (1) had significant trouble with insomnia or (2) had taken a medication to induce sleep. Comparison groups were flurazepam, temazepam, triazolam, and over-the-counter (OTC) sleep medications. An untreated insomnia group also was included. Results indicate that most users of prescription hypnotics attributed positive effects to their sleep medications and that adverse effects were infrequent. OTC hypnotics were less effective and more likely to produce negative effects. The untreated insomnia group was more symptomatic than any of the medication groups.
本文报告了一项针对四座城市的催眠药物利弊的研究结果。该研究采用了一种新的志愿者电话报名方法,以监测临床环境之外的药物效果。通过报纸广告招募受访者。如果他们在过去12个月内(1)有严重的失眠问题或(2)服用过诱导睡眠的药物,就会被邀请完成一次简短的电话采访。对照组为氟西泮、替马西泮、三唑仑和非处方(OTC)睡眠药物。还纳入了一个未经治疗的失眠组。结果表明,大多数处方催眠药物使用者将积极效果归因于他们的睡眠药物,且不良反应很少见。非处方催眠药物效果较差,且更有可能产生负面影响。未经治疗的失眠组比任何药物组的症状都更严重。