Am J Clin Pathol. 2010 Sep;134(3):374-80. doi: 10.1309/AJCPDQOSB7QR5GLR.
Considerable resources have been invested in recent years to improve laboratory systems in resource-limited settings. We reviewed published reports, interviewed major donor organizations, and conducted case studies of laboratory systems in 3 countries to assess how countries and donors have worked together to improve laboratory services. While infrastructure and the provision of services have seen improvement, important opportunities remain for further advancement. Implementation of national laboratory plans is inconsistent, human resources are limited, and quality laboratory services rarely extend to lower tier laboratories (eg, health clinics, district hospitals). Coordination within, between, and among governments and donor organizations is also frequently problematic. Laboratory standardization and quality control are improving but remain challenging, making accreditation a difficult goal. Host country governments and their external funding partners should coordinate their efforts effectively around a host country's own national laboratory plan to advance sustainable capacity development throughout a country's laboratory system.
近年来,为了改善资源有限环境中的实验室系统,投入了大量资源。我们查阅了已发表的报告,采访了主要捐助组织,并对 3 个国家的实验室系统进行了案例研究,以评估各国和捐助者如何共同努力改善实验室服务。虽然基础设施和服务的提供有所改善,但仍有重要机会进一步推进。国家实验室计划的执行情况不一致,人力资源有限,质量实验室服务很少扩展到较低层次的实验室(例如,卫生诊所、地区医院)。政府内部、政府之间以及政府与捐助组织之间的协调也经常存在问题。实验室标准化和质量控制正在改善,但仍然具有挑战性,使认证成为一个困难的目标。所在国政府及其外部供资伙伴应围绕所在国自己的国家实验室计划,有效协调努力,在整个国家的实验室系统中推进可持续能力发展。