Why won't defenders of the Cartwright Inquiry provide evidence to justify their use of the term 'conventional treatment' for carcinoma in situ?
作者信息
Chalmers Iain
出版信息
N Z Med J. 2010 Jul 30;123(1319):109-12.
PMID:20717187
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Why won't defenders of the Cartwright Inquiry provide evidence to justify their use of the term 'conventional treatment' for carcinoma in situ?
N Z Med J. 2010 Jul 30;123(1319):109-12.
2
The Unfortunate Experiment debate: Manning response to Chalmers.
N Z Med J. 2010 Aug 13;123(1320):113-4.
3
Confusion surrounding the unfortunate experiment.
N Z Med J. 2010 Sep 24;123(1323):84.
4
Response to the Missing Manuscript editorial.
N Z Med J. 2010 Aug 13;123(1320):118.
5
6
7
Defendants of the Cartwright Inquiry are unable to provide a description of 'adequate care' for cervical carcinoma in situ.
N Z Med J. 2010 Sep 10;123(1322):85-7.
8
Reassessing Cartwright--understanding the factual record.
N Z Med J. 2010 Aug 27;123(1321):88-94.
9
10
A patient's response to recent criticisms of the findings in the report of the Cervical Cancer Inquiry 1988.
N Z Med J. 2010 Aug 27;123(1321):95-101.
Zotero 插件