A response to Professor Bryder's comments on 'Consequences in women of participating in a study of the natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3'.
作者信息
McCredie Margaret
出版信息
N Z Med J. 2010 Aug 13;123(1320):115-7.
PMID:20720613
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
2
Response to the Missing Manuscript editorial.
N Z Med J. 2010 Aug 13;123(1320):118.
3
A response to Ms Sandercock and Dr Burls regarding the methods used in the analysis for our first paper 'Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3'.针对桑德科克女士和伯尔斯博士对我们第一篇论文《宫颈上皮内瘤变3级女性的宫颈肿瘤自然史及浸润癌风险》分析中所使用方法的回应。
N Z Med J. 2010 Aug 27;123(1321):105-7.
4
5
The Unfortunate Experiment debate: Manning response to Chalmers.
N Z Med J. 2010 Aug 13;123(1320):113-4.
6
Confusion surrounding the unfortunate experiment.
N Z Med J. 2010 Sep 24;123(1323):84.
7
8
A patient's response to recent criticisms of the findings in the report of the Cervical Cancer Inquiry 1988.一名患者对近期针对1988年宫颈癌调查报告中研究结果的批评的回应。
N Z Med J. 2010 Aug 27;123(1321):95-101.
9
A response to Dr Paul Patten. Re: a particular relationship.对保罗·帕滕博士的回应。主题：一种特殊关系。
N Z Med J. 2010 Aug 27;123(1321):102.
10
Reassessing Cartwright--understanding the factual record.重新评估卡特赖特——了解事实记录。
N Z Med J. 2010 Aug 27;123(1321):88-94.
Zotero 插件