Kane Eileen M
Penn State Dickinson School of Law, USA.
Seton Hall Law Rev. 2009;39(4):1137-72.
A twenty-first century novel influenza A (H1N1) pandemic is currently unfolding, and the eventual scope of this public health crisis is not clear. In addition, ongoing surveillance of the avian influenza A (H5N1) virus reveals outbreaks of human-to-human transmission of the virus, with significant mortality. Effective pandemic management depends on pharmaceutical intervention with two different clinical objectives: the generation of an immune response to specific viral strains (vaccination) and the reduction of viral replication in an infected individual (antiviral administration). The ability to offer pharmaceutical interventions for a public health crisis depends on three factors: development, capacity, and access. Pharmaceutical measures must be developed, capacity must be established, and access must be ensured. The article discusses the three nodes of patenting that influence the availability of pharmaceutical countermeasures in an influenza pandemic. Identification of the causative influenza virus is the first step in pandemic management and precedes vaccine design, and the virus and its RNA sequence are both knowledge assets and inputs for vaccine design. Vaccine development, therefore, will be influenced by any patents on the genetic sequences or proteins of the pandemic virus, as well as on novel methods for vaccine production, the actual vaccine or adjuvant technology, all of which are relevant to the assembly of a working vaccine on short notice. Pharmaceutical treatment of influenza infection during a pandemic could also rely on use of patented antiviral drugs, whose efficacy may be revealed as the pandemic unfolds. Unlike vaccines, these are not generally developed de novo for a pandemic, but their availability could be dependent on the exercise of patent rights by market incumbents. Patent rights could control capacity, which may determine access. Pandemic planning must consider how patenting can influence development, capacity and access to pharmaceutical interventions. The national and international public health authorities are slowly integrating intellectual property considerations into pandemic planning. Further integration will anticipate the emergence of patent claims, identify any relevant patents, encourage access norms, and consider the use of legal mechanisms that could alleviate patent-mediated obstacles to the availability of critical products and methods that may be patented. Pandemic management must also co-exist with existing efforts to control seasonal influenza outbreaks. The article analyzes the intersection of patent nodes relevant to vaccine development and to antiviral distribution during a global influenza pandemic, identifying where such patents may facilitate or inhibit the availability of pharmaceutical countermeasures, and offers preliminary observations on the emerging novel H1N1 pandemic. The goal of international clinical equality is essential for the eradication of an influenza pandemic, and strategies for its achievement can also be applied to other diseases.
一场21世纪的甲型H1N1流感大流行正在展开,这场公共卫生危机的最终规模尚不明朗。此外,对甲型H5N1禽流感病毒的持续监测显示该病毒出现了人际传播疫情,且死亡率颇高。有效的大流行管理依赖于具有两个不同临床目标的药物干预措施:针对特定病毒株产生免疫反应(接种疫苗)以及减少受感染个体体内的病毒复制(给予抗病毒药物)。提供针对公共卫生危机的药物干预措施的能力取决于三个因素:研发、生产能力和获取途径。必须开展药物措施的研发,建立生产能力,并确保获取途径。本文讨论了影响流感大流行期间药物应对措施可得性的三个专利节点。识别致病性流感病毒是大流行管理的第一步,且先于疫苗设计,而病毒及其RNA序列既是知识资产,也是疫苗设计的输入信息。因此,疫苗研发将受到有关大流行病毒基因序列或蛋白质的任何专利、疫苗生产新方法、实际疫苗或佐剂技术的影响,所有这些都与在短时间内组装有效疫苗相关。大流行期间流感感染的药物治疗也可能依赖于使用专利抗病毒药物,其疗效可能会随着大流行的发展而显现。与疫苗不同,这些药物一般不会专门为大流行而全新研发,但其可得性可能取决于市场主导者对专利权的行使。专利权可能会控制生产能力,而生产能力可能决定获取途径。大流行规划必须考虑专利如何影响药物干预措施的研发、生产能力和获取途径。国家和国际公共卫生当局正在逐步将知识产权考量纳入大流行规划。进一步的整合将预测专利主张的出现,识别任何相关专利,鼓励获取规范,并考虑使用法律机制,以缓解专利对关键产品和方法可得性造成的障碍,这些产品和方法可能已获专利。大流行管理还必须与现有的控制季节性流感疫情的努力并存。本文分析了全球流感大流行期间与疫苗研发和抗病毒药物分发相关的专利节点的交叉情况,确定这些专利可能在哪些方面促进或抑制药物应对措施的可得性,并对新出现的甲型H1N1流感大流行提供初步观察结果。国际临床平等的目标对于根除流感大流行至关重要,实现这一目标的策略也可应用于其他疾病。