• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定性访谈:实践准备

Qualitative interviewing: preparation for practice.

作者信息

Banner Davina J

机构信息

University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia.

出版信息

Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2010;20(3):27-34.

PMID:20718237
Abstract

Oualitative research approaches are diverse and provide the opportunity to explore the experiences, behaviours,. contexts and lifestyle choices of individuals with cardiovascular disease. Understanding these complex health and social factors is essential to the delivery of responsive health care services that improve patient satisfaction and health outcomes. In-depth interviewing is a popular and versatile data collection method used in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative research interviews are not as simple as they may first seem and involve complex interactions that employ a range of communication and interpretation skills. Preparation for interview practice can promote rigour and help avoid pitfalls, such as premature interpretation of research data, inadequate depth of questioning, and the identification of researcher presuppositions that may influence data collection and analysis. In this research column, an overview of qualitative interviewing is presented followed by a brief outline of practice techniques to improve the execution and outcomes of this valuable data collection method.

摘要

定性研究方法多种多样,为探索心血管疾病患者的经历、行为、背景和生活方式选择提供了机会。了解这些复杂的健康和社会因素对于提供能提高患者满意度和健康结果的响应式医疗服务至关重要。深度访谈是定性研究中常用且通用的数据收集方法。定性研究访谈并不像乍看起来那么简单,它涉及复杂的互动,需要运用一系列沟通和解释技巧。为访谈实践做准备可以提高严谨性并有助于避免一些陷阱,比如对研究数据的过早解读、提问深度不足以及识别可能影响数据收集和分析的研究者预设。在本研究专栏中,将首先概述定性访谈,然后简要介绍一些实践技巧,以改进这种有价值的数据收集方法的实施和结果。

相似文献

1
Qualitative interviewing: preparation for practice.定性访谈:实践准备
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2010;20(3):27-34.
2
Using reflexivity to enhance in-depth interviewing skills for the clinician researcher.运用反身性提高临床研究人员的深入访谈技巧。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Nov 9;8:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-73.
3
The joys and challenges of semi-structured interviewing.半结构式访谈的乐趣与挑战。
Community Pract. 2010 Jul;83(7):18-21.
4
Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups.文献综述:针对文化和语言背景各异群体开展焦点小组研究的注意事项
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1000-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01760.x.
5
Conceptual, holistic, and pragmatic considerations for interviewing research participants.访谈研究参与者的概念性、整体性和实用性考量。
Holist Nurs Pract. 2010 May-Jun;24(3):148-57. doi: 10.1097/HNP.0b013e3181dd4732.
6
The persistence of memory: using narrative picturing to co-operatively explore life stories in qualitative inquiry.记忆的延续:在质性研究中运用叙事性描绘来合作探索生活故事
Nurs Inq. 2007 Mar;14(1):35-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2007.00350.x.
7
Understanding experience through Gadamerian hermeneutics: an interview with Brian Phillips. Interview by Pamela Wood & Lynne Giddings.通过伽达默尔诠释学理解经验:对布莱恩·菲利普斯的访谈。访谈者:帕梅拉·伍德及琳恩·吉丁斯
Nurs Prax N Z. 2005 Jul;21(2):3-14.
8
Ethical components of researcher researched relationships in qualitative interviewing.定性访谈中研究者与被研究者关系的伦理组成部分。
Qual Health Res. 2007 Oct;17(8):1149-59. doi: 10.1177/1049732307308305.
9
The interview in qualitative research.定性研究中的访谈
Urol Nurs. 2005 Apr;25(2):124-5.
10
Phenomenological qualitative interviewing and the novice researcher.现象学质性访谈与新手研究者
Pract Midwife. 2010 Feb;13(2):22-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Simulated Interviews, Real Results: A feasibility Study Implementing "Standardized Research Participants" cases in Qualitative Research Training with Older Adults.模拟访谈,真实结果:一项在针对老年人的定性研究培训中实施“标准化研究参与者”案例的可行性研究
Res Sq. 2025 Jul 7:rs.3.rs-6573498. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6573498/v1.
2
"Switching Hats": Insights From Experienced Clinical Interviewers Turned Novice Research Interviewers.“转换角色”:来自经验丰富的临床访谈者转变为新手研究访谈者的见解。
Qual Health Res. 2025 Feb;35(2):135-143. doi: 10.1177/10497323241234008. Epub 2024 Mar 18.