Gardner Marcia R
College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102, USA.
Holist Nurs Pract. 2010 May-Jun;24(3):148-57. doi: 10.1097/HNP.0b013e3181dd4732.
Interviews are commonly used as data collection method in many types of studies. Interviewers and researchers may be challenged to take a holistic view of the interviewing process and to acknowledge participants' perspectives and experiences, understand the implications of dialogue between interviewers and participants, guide data collection to address research questions and aims of a study, and ensure that high-quality data is collected for analysis. This article addresses the need to integrate a holistic perspective into data collection and reviews general and specific interviewing considerations, including assessment and conceptualization of potential research vulnerability of participants, factors that may influence the quality of data collected through interviews, interviewing strategies, interview facilitation, and specific strategies to acknowledge a specialized population in terms of vulnerability, dialogue, power, and study rigor. Data and exemplars from a grounded theory study of mothers of medically fragile infants are used to illustrate some of the challenges inherent in the use of interviews for data collection.
访谈通常被用作多种研究类型中的数据收集方法。访谈者和研究人员可能面临挑战,需要从整体角度看待访谈过程,承认参与者的观点和经历,理解访谈者与参与者之间对话的影响,指导数据收集以解决研究问题和研究目的,并确保收集高质量的数据用于分析。本文论述了将整体视角纳入数据收集的必要性,并回顾了一般和具体的访谈考量因素,包括对参与者潜在研究脆弱性的评估和概念化、可能影响通过访谈收集的数据质量的因素、访谈策略、访谈促进,以及在脆弱性、对话、权力和研究严谨性方面承认特殊人群的具体策略。一项对医学上脆弱婴儿母亲的扎根理论研究中的数据和示例,用于说明使用访谈进行数据收集所固有的一些挑战。