Lemov Rebecca
Department of the History of Science, Harvard University, 371 Science Center, 1 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Isis. 2010 Jun;101(2):401-11. doi: 10.1086/653107.
The introspectometer was a "hypothetical machine" Robert K. Merton introduced in the course of a 1956 how-to manual describing an actual research technique, the focused interview. This technique, in turn, formed the basis of wartime morale research and consumer behavior studies as well as perhaps the most ubiquitous social science tool, the focus group. This essay explores a new perspective on Cold War social science made possible by comparing two kinds of apparatuses: one real, the other imaginary. Even as Merton explored the nightmare potential of such machines, he suggested that the clear aim of social science was to build them or their functional equivalent: recording machines to access a person's experiential stream of reality, with the ability to turn this stream into real-time data. In this way, the introspectometer marks and symbolizes a broader entry during the Cold War of science-fiction-style aspirations into methodological prescriptions and procedural manuals. This essay considers the growth of the genre of methodological visions and revisions, painstakingly argued and absorbed, but punctuated by sci-fi aims to transform "the human" and build newly penetrating machines. It also considers the place of the nearly real-, and the artificial "near-substitute" as part of an experimental urge that animated these sciences.
内省仪是罗伯特·K·默顿在1956年一本关于实际研究技术——聚焦访谈的操作手册中引入的“假想机器”。反过来,这项技术构成了战时士气研究、消费者行为研究以及可能是最普遍的社会科学工具——焦点小组的基础。本文通过比较两种仪器探索了冷战社会科学的一个新视角:一种是真实的,另一种是虚构的。尽管默顿探究了这类机器的潜在可怕之处,但他指出社会科学的明确目标是制造它们或其功能等效物:记录机器,用以获取一个人现实的体验流,并能将这一流转变为实时数据。这样,内省仪标志并象征着科幻式的抱负在冷战期间更广泛地进入方法论规范和程序手册。本文探讨了精心论证并被采纳的方法论设想与修正这一类型的发展,但其间断断续续地穿插着科幻目标,即改造“人类”并制造新的洞察机器。本文还探讨了近乎真实的事物以及人造“近似替代品”作为推动这些学科发展的实验冲动的一部分所占据的位置。